» Articles » PMID: 29727831

Building CT Radiomics Based Nomogram for Preoperative Esophageal Cancer Patients Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction

Overview
Journal Transl Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 May 5
PMID 29727831
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To build and validate a radiomics-based nomogram for the prediction of pre-operation lymph node (LN) metastasis in esophageal cancer.

Patients And Methods: A total of 197 esophageal cancer patients were enrolled in this study, and their LN metastases have been pathologically confirmed. The data were collected from January 2016 to May 2016; patients in the first three months were set in the training cohort, and patients in April 2016 were set in the validation cohort. About 788 radiomics features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) images of the patients. The elastic-net approach was exploited for dimension reduction and selection of the feature space. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was adopted to build the radiomics signature and another predictive nomogram model. The predictive nomogram model was composed of three factors with the radiomics signature, where CT reported the LN number and position risk level. The performance and usefulness of the built model were assessed by the calibration and decision curve analysis.

Results: Thirteen radiomics features were selected to build the radiomics signature. The radiomics signature was significantly associated with the LN metastasis (P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomics signature performance in the training cohort was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.732-0.881), and in the validation cohort it was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.632-0.910). The model showed good discrimination, with a Harrell's Concordance Index of 0.768 (0.672 to 0.864, 95% CI) in the training cohort and 0.754 (0.603 to 0.895, 95% CI) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis showed our model will receive benefit when the threshold probability was larger than 0.15.

Conclusion: The present study proposed a radiomics-based nomogram involving the radiomics signature, so the CT reported the status of the suspected LN and the dummy variable of the tumor position. It can be potentially applied in the individual preoperative prediction of the LN metastasis status in esophageal cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Clinical value of the nomogram model based on endoscopic ultrasonography radiomics and clinical indicators in identifying benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas.

Fan X, Huang J, Cai X, Maihemuti A, Li S, Fang W Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1504593.

PMID: 40046629 PMC: 11879810. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1504593.


Bibliometric and visual analysis of radiomics for evaluating lymph node status in oncology.

Lyu G, Tong T, Yang G, Zhao J, Xu Z, Zheng N Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1501652.

PMID: 39610679 PMC: 11602298. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1501652.


Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients via an intratumoral and peritumoral multiparameter MRI radiomics nomogram.

Yan B, Zhao T, Deng Y, Zhang Y Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1472892.

PMID: 39364314 PMC: 11446724. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1472892.


Preoperative identification of small metastatic lymph nodes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using CT radiomics of lymph nodes.

Wu Y, Wu L, Ou J, Tang S, Cao J, Fu M Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(3):1123-1132.

PMID: 39305294 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04585-1.


Radiomics diagnostic performance for predicting lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ma D, Zhou T, Chen J, Chen J BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):144.

PMID: 38867143 PMC: 11170881. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01278-5.


References
1.
van Vliet E, Heijenbrok-Kal M, Hunink M, Kuipers E, Siersema P . Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2008; 98(3):547-57. PMC: 2243147. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604200. View

2.
van Rossum P, van Hillegersberg R, Lever F, Lips I, van Lier A, Meijer G . Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(7):1753-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2773-6. View

3.
Vickers A, Cronin A, Elkin E, Gonen M . Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8:53. PMC: 2611975. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-53. View

4.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A . Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62(5):283-98. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21153. View

5.
Yip S, Aerts H . Applications and limitations of radiomics. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61(13):R150-66. PMC: 4927328. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/13/R150. View