» Articles » PMID: 29707915

Development of an Organ-specific Insert Phantom Generated Using a 3D Printer for Investigations of Cardiac Computed Tomography Protocols

Overview
Date 2018 May 1
PMID 29707915
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: An ideal organ-specific insert phantom should be able to simulate the anatomical features with appropriate appearances in the resultant computed tomography (CT) images. This study investigated a 3D printing technology to develop a novel and cost-effective cardiac insert phantom derived from volumetric CT image datasets of anthropomorphic chest phantom.

Methods: Cardiac insert volumes were segmented from CT image datasets, derived from an anthropomorphic chest phantom of Lungman N-01 (Kyoto Kagaku, Japan). These segmented datasets were converted to a virtual 3D-isosurface of heart-shaped shell, while two other removable inserts were included using computer-aided design (CAD) software program. This newly designed cardiac insert phantom was later printed by using a fused deposition modelling (FDM) process via a Creatbot DM Plus 3D printer. Then, several selected filling materials, such as contrast media, oil, water and jelly, were loaded into designated spaces in the 3D-printed phantom. The 3D-printed cardiac insert phantom was positioned within the anthropomorphic chest phantom and 30 repeated CT acquisitions performed using a multi-detector scanner at 120-kVp tube potential. Attenuation (Hounsfield Unit, HU) values were measured and compared to the image datasets of real-patient and Catphan 500 phantom.

Results: The output of the 3D-printed cardiac insert phantom was a solid acrylic plastic material, which was strong, light in weight and cost-effective. HU values of the filling materials were comparable to the image datasets of real-patient and Catphan 500 phantom.

Conclusions: A novel and cost-effective cardiac insert phantom for anthropomorphic chest phantom was developed using volumetric CT image datasets with a 3D printer. Hence, this suggested the printing methodology could be applied to generate other phantoms for CT imaging studies.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular computed tomography in cardiovascular disease: An overview of its applications from diagnosis to prediction.

Sun Z J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024; 21(5):550-576.

PMID: 38948894 PMC: 11211902. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.05.002.


Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease: Beyond Lumen Assessment.

Sun Z, Silberstein J, Vaccarezza M J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38248892 PMC: 10816599. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11010022.


A customized anthropomorphic 3D-printed phantom to reproducibility assessment in computed tomography: an oncological case study.

Cavaliere C, Baldi D, Brancato V, Aiello M, Salvatore M Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1123796.

PMID: 37700836 PMC: 10493384. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1123796.


Three-Dimensional Bioprinting in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Directions.

Sun Z, Zhao J, Leung E, Flandes-Iparraguirre M, Vernon M, Silberstein J Biomolecules. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37627245 PMC: 10452258. DOI: 10.3390/biom13081180.


Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific computed tomography lung phantoms: a reader study.

Shapira N, Donovan K, Mei K, Geagan M, Roshkovan L, Gang G PNAS Nexus. 2023; 2(3):pgad026.

PMID: 36909822 PMC: 9992761. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad026.


References
1.
Leng S, Chen B, Vrieze T, Kuhlmann J, Yu L, Alexander A . Construction of realistic phantoms from patient images and a commercial three-dimensional printer. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016; 3(3):033501. PMC: 4935810. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.033501. View

2.
Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, Raaijmakers R, Mollet N, Pattynama P . Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology. 2004; 233(3):817-23. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333030668. View

3.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J, Pujol S . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1323-41. PMC: 3466397. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. View

4.
Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G . CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. Phys Med. 2011; 28(2):161-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.03.003. View

5.
Madamesila J, McGeachy P, Villarreal Barajas J, Khan R . Characterizing 3D printing in the fabrication of variable density phantoms for quality assurance of radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2015; 32(1):242-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.013. View