» Articles » PMID: 29696188

Predicting Enrollment Performance of Investigational Centers in Phase III Multi-center Clinical Trials

Overview
Date 2018 Apr 27
PMID 29696188
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Failure to meet subject recruitment targets in clinical trials continues to be a widespread problem with potentially serious scientific, logistical, financial and ethical consequences. On the operational level, enrollment-related issues may be mitigated by careful site selection and by allocating monitoring or training resources proportionally to the anticipated risk of poor enrollment. Such procedures require estimates of the expected recruitment performance that are sufficiently reliable to allow centers to be sensibly categorized. In this study, we investigate whether information obtained from feasibility questionnaires can potentially be used to predict which centers will and which centers will not meet their enrollment targets by means of multivariable logistic regression analysis. From a large set of 59 candidate predictors, we determined the subset that is optimal for predictive purposes using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization. Although the extent to which the results are generalizable remains to be determined, they indicate that the prediction accuracy of the optimal model is only a marginal improvement over the intercept-only model, illustrating the difficulty of prediction in this setting.

Citing Articles

Enhancing site selection strategies in clinical trial recruitment using real-world data modeling.

Hulstaert L, Twick I, Sarsour K, Verstraete H PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300109.

PMID: 38466688 PMC: 10927105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300109.


Clinical trial facilitators: A novel approach to support the execution of clinical research at the study site level.

McClure J, Asghar A, Krajec A, Johnson M, Subramanian S, Caroff K Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023; 33:101106.

PMID: 37063166 PMC: 10028341. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101106.


Quantifying geographical accessibility to cancer clinical trials in different income landscapes.

Tini G, Trapani D, Duso B, Beria P, Curigliano G, Pelicci P ESMO Open. 2022; 7(3):100515.

PMID: 35738201 PMC: 9271515. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100515.


Clinical trial site identification practices and the use of electronic health records in feasibility evaluations: An interview study in the Nordic countries.

Laaksonen N, Bengtstrom M, Axelin A, Blomster J, Scheinin M, Huupponen R Clin Trials. 2021; 18(6):724-731.

PMID: 34431408 PMC: 8592101. DOI: 10.1177/17407745211038512.


Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.

Fogel D Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018; 11:156-164.

PMID: 30112460 PMC: 6092479. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001.

References
1.
Rahman S, Majumder M, Shaban S, Rahman N, Ahmed M, Bin Abdulrahman K . Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013; 2:85-93. PMC: 3661249. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S14103. View

2.
McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J . What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006; 7:9. PMC: 1475627. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9. View

3.
Levett K, Roberts C, Simpson J, Morris J . Site-specific predictors of successful recruitment to a perinatal clinical trial. Clin Trials. 2014; 11(5):584-9. DOI: 10.1177/1740774514543539. View

4.
Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S . Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(1):e000496. PMC: 3253423. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000496. View

5.
Donovan J, Peters T, Noble S, Powell P, Gillatt D, Oliver S . Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study). J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(7):605-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00083-0. View