» Articles » PMID: 29692894

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Staying out of Trouble Intraoperatively

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2018 Apr 26
PMID 29692894
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Total hip Arthroplasty is one of the most successful and commonly performed procedures in Orthopaedic Surgery. Meticulous preoperative planning allows to surgeon anticipate potential problems to reduce postoperative complications and optimize patient outcomes. Currently, the posterior approach is the most common approach utilized in the United States. In order to prevent errors in stem version, especially with cementless fixation, the entry point should be posterior, and the initial entry point should be aligned in the correct anteversion as this will determine the ultimate version of the stem. Preoperative evaluation should asses for true and apparent lengths. For successful osseointegration of cementless components, bone ingrowth occurs when there is less than 40 μm of motion between the implant and bone. Certain socket conformations such as elliptical versus hemispherical are more prone to generate fractures at the time of impaction.

Citing Articles

Abnormal Spinopelvic Motion and Spine Deformity are Associated With Native Femoral Retroversion in the Setting of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Deckey D, Rosenow C, Lai C, Christopher Z, Verhey J, Schwartz A Arthroplast Today. 2022; 17:150-154.

PMID: 36158464 PMC: 9493293. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.08.005.


Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.

Emara A, Ng M, Krebs V, Bloomfield M, Molloy R, Piuzzi N Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021; 14(1):47-59.

PMID: 33453016 PMC: 7930165. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09681-5.


Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Neupane G, Madhusudhan R, Shrestha A, Vaishya R Indian J Orthop. 2020; 54(6):784-794.

PMID: 33133401 PMC: 7573004. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00146-y.


Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Yang X, Huang H, Sun L, Yang Z, Deng C, Tian X Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(4):1065-1073.

PMID: 32558261 PMC: 7454221. DOI: 10.1111/os.12669.


Clinical outcomes and complication profile of total hip arthroplasty after lumbar spine fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Onggo J, Nambiar M, Onggo J, Phan K, Ambikaipalan A, Babazadeh S Eur Spine J. 2019; 29(2):282-294.

PMID: 31676947 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06201-z.

References
1.
Archbold H, Mockford B, Molloy D, McConway J, Ogonda L, Beverland D . The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(7):883-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17577. View

2.
Callaghan J, Engh Jr C, Fehring T, Garvin K, Lachiewicz P, Mabry T . How do I get out of this jam? Overcoming common intraoperative problems in primary total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2015; 64:307-25. View

3.
Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M . Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7):1487-97. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02441. View

4.
Xue E, Su Z, Chen C, Wong P, Wen H, Zhang Y . An intraoperative device to restore femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014; 9:58. PMC: 4223551. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0058-7. View

5.
Dorr L, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z . Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(1):119-27. PMC: 2600986. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0598-4. View