» Articles » PMID: 29684414

Examining Variability in Parent Feeding Practices Within a Low-income, Racially/ethnically Diverse, and Immigrant Population Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2018 Apr 24
PMID 29684414
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current measures of parent feeding practices are typically survey-based and assessed as static/unchanging characteristics, failing to account for fluctuations in these behaviors across time and context. The current study uses ecological momentary assessment to examine variability of, and predictors of, parent feeding practices within a low-income, racially/ethnically diverse, and immigrant sample.

Methods: Children ages 5-7 years old and their parents (n = 150 dyads) from six racial/ethnic groups (n = 25 from each; Black/African American, Hispanic, Hmong, Native American, Somali, White) were recruited for this mixed-methods study through primary care clinics.

Results: Among parents who used restriction (49%) and pressure-to-eat (69%) feeding practices, these feeding practices were utilized about every other day. Contextual factors at the meal associated with parent feeding practices included: number of people at the meal, who prepared the meal, types of food served at meals (e.g., pre-prepared, homemade, fast food), meal setting (e.g., kitchen table, front room), and meal emotional atmosphere (p < 0.05). Parents tended to restrict desserts, dairy, and vegetables and pressure children to eat fruits, vegetables, meat proteins, and refined grains (p < 0.05). There were some differences by race/ethnicity across findings (p < 0.01), with Hmong parents engaging in the highest levels of pressure-to-eat feeding practices.

Conclusions: Parent feeding practices varied across the week, indicating feeding practices are more likely to be context-specific, or state-like than trait-like. There were some meal characteristics more strongly associated with engaging in restriction and pressure-to-eat feeding practices. Given that parent feeding practices appear to be state-like, future interventions and health care providers who work with parents and children may want to address contextual factors associated with parent feeding practices to decrease restriction and pressure-to-eat parent feeding practices.

Citing Articles

Capturing Everyday Parental Feeding Practices and Eating Behaviors of 3- to 5-Year-Old Children With Avid Eating Behavior: Ecological Momentary Assessment Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Pickard A, Edwards K, Farrow C, Haycraft E, Blissett J JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e66807.

PMID: 40014004 PMC: 11884305. DOI: 10.2196/66807.


Parents' use of coercive and indulgent feeding practices for children with avid eating behaviour: an Ecological Momentary Assessment study.

Pickard A, Edwards K, Farrow C, Haycraft E, Herle M, Llewellyn C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):16.

PMID: 39920643 PMC: 11803941. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-025-01715-w.


Association between parental resource depletion and parent use of specific food parenting practices: An ecological momentary assessment study.

Tate A, Trofholz A, Youngblood A, Goldschmidt A, Berge J Appetite. 2024; 199:107368.

PMID: 38643902 PMC: 11163443. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107368.


Examining Parent Mood, Feeding Context, and Feeding Goals as Predictors of Feeding Practices Used by Parents of Preschool Children With Avid Eating Behavior: Protocol for an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Edwards K, Croker H, Farrow C, Haycraft E, Herle M, Llewellyn C JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e55193.

PMID: 38502178 PMC: 10988368. DOI: 10.2196/55193.


Associations between parental engagement in disordered eating behaviors and use of specific food parenting practices within a racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse sample.

Loth K, Vomacka E, Hazzard V, Trofholz A, Berge J Appetite. 2024; 195:107253.

PMID: 38331099 PMC: 11009163. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107253.


References
1.
Ogden C, Carroll M, Kit B, Flegal K . Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012; 307(5):483-90. PMC: 6362452. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.40. View

2.
Vaughn A, Ward D, Fisher J, Faith M, Hughes S, Kremers S . Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev. 2016; 74(2):98-117. PMC: 4892304. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv061. View

3.
Trofholz A, Schulte A, Berge J . How parents describe picky eating and its impact on family meals: A qualitative analysis. Appetite. 2016; 110:36-43. PMC: 5243124. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.027. View

4.
Black M, Aboud F . Responsive feeding is embedded in a theoretical framework of responsive parenting. J Nutr. 2011; 141(3):490-4. PMC: 3040905. DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.129973. View

5.
Berge J, Tate A, Trofholz A, Fertig A, Crow S, Neumark-Sztainer D . Examining within- and across-day relationships between transient and chronic stress and parent food-related parenting practices in a racially/ethnically diverse and immigrant population : Stress types and food-related parenting practices. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):7. PMC: 5771034. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0629-1. View