» Articles » PMID: 29682016

Neurological Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastases

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Apr 24
PMID 29682016
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Spinal metastases lead to bony instability and spinal cord compression resulting in intractable pain and neurological deficits which affect ambulatory function and quality of life. The most appropriate treatment for spinal metastasis is still debated.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcome, quality of life, complications, and survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastases.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients with spinal metastases surgically treated at our facility between March 2008 and March 2013 was performed. Evaluations include hospital charts, initial and interval imaging studies, neurological outcome, and surgical complications. Follow-up examinations were performed every 3 months after surgery.

Results: Seventy patients underwent surgical intervention for treatment of spinal metastasis in our institution. There were 27 women and 43 men. The preoperative pain was reported in 65 patients (93%), whereas postoperative complete pain relief was reported in 16 patients (24%), and pain levels decreased in 38 patients (58%). Preoperative 39 patients were ambulant and 31 patients were nonambulant. Postoperative 52 patients were ambulant and 18 patients were nonambulant. Postoperative complications were experienced in 10 (14.2%) patients, and the patient survival rate was 71% (50 patients) at 3 months, 49% (34 patients) at 1 year. The postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 4.2%.

Conclusion: Surgical decompression for a metastatic spinal tumor can improve the quality of life in a substantially high percentage of patients with acceptable complications rate.

Citing Articles

Quality of life in patients with malignant spinal cord compression: a systematic review.

Gojsevic M, Shariati S, Chan A, Bonomo P, Zhang E, Kennedy S Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(12):736.

PMID: 38055061 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08186-4.


An Overview of Decision Making in the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors.

Zaveri G, Jain R, Mehta N, Garg B Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55(4):799-814.

PMID: 34194637 PMC: 8192670. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00368-8.


Perioperative mortality of metastatic spinal disease with unknown primary: A case report and review of literature.

Li X, Jin L World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9(2):379-388.

PMID: 33521105 PMC: 7812883. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i2.379.

References
1.
Falicov A, Fisher C, Sparkes J, Boyd M, Wing P, Dvorak M . Impact of surgical intervention on quality of life in patients with spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(24):2849-56. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245838.37817.40. View

2.
Jansson K, Bauer H . Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(2):196-202. PMC: 3489401. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0870-6. View

3.
Liang T, Wan Y, Zou X, Peng X, Liu S . Is surgery for spine metastasis reasonable in patients older than 60 years?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(2):628-39. PMC: 3549148. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2699-3. View

4.
Rades D, Huttenlocher S, Dunst J, Bajrovic A, Karstens J, Rudat V . Matched pair analysis comparing surgery followed by radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone for metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(22):3597-604. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5635. View

5.
Tomita K, Kawahara N, Murakami H, Demura S . Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: improvement of the technique and its associated basic background. J Orthop Sci. 2006; 11(1):3-12. PMC: 2780651. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-005-0964-y. View