» Articles » PMID: 29672115

Effects of Aging, Word Frequency, and Text Stimulus Quality on Reading Across the Adult Lifespan: Evidence from Eye Movements

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Apr 20
PMID 29672115
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reductions in stimulus quality may disrupt the reading performance of older adults more when compared with young adults because of sensory declines that begin early in middle age. However, few studies have investigated adult age differences in the effects of stimulus quality on reading, and none have examined how this affects lexical processing and eye movement control. Accordingly, we report two experiments that examine the effects of reduced stimulus quality on the eye movements of young (18-24 years), middle-aged (41-51 years), and older (65+ years) adult readers. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences that contained a high- or low-frequency critical word and that were presented normally or with contrast reduced so that words appeared faint. Experiment 2 further investigated effects of reduced stimulus quality using a gaze-contingent technique to present upcoming text normally or with contrast reduced. Typical patterns of age-related reading difficulty (e.g., slower reading, more regressions) were observed in both experiments. In addition, eye movements were disrupted more for older than younger adults when all text (Experiment 1) or just upcoming text (Experiment 2) appeared faint. Moreover, there was an interaction between stimulus quality and word frequency (Experiment 1), such that readers fixated faint low-frequency words for disproportionately longer. Crucially, this effect was similar across all age groups. Thus, although older readers suffer more from reduced stimulus quality, this additional difficulty primarily affects their visual processing of text. These findings have important implications for understanding the role of stimulus quality on reading behavior across the lifespan. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

The role of predictive and preview effects in Mongolian reading: evidence from eye movements.

Lu Z, Ri N, Jingxin W Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1420223.

PMID: 39346505 PMC: 11427253. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420223.


Enhancing reading speed: the reading acceleration effect in Italian adult readers.

Zamfira D, Di Dona G, Battista M, De Benedetto F, Ronconi L Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1394579.

PMID: 39144609 PMC: 11322054. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394579.


The Complexity of Reading Revealed by a Study with Healthy Older Adults.

Pegoraro S, Facchin A, Luchesa F, Rolandi E, Guaita A, Arduino L Brain Sci. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38539618 PMC: 10968258. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14030230.


No Correlation Between Articulation Speed and Silent Reading Rate when Adults Read Short Texts.

Brysbaert M, Vantieghem A Psychol Belg. 2023; 63(1):82-91.

PMID: 37483467 PMC: 10360968. DOI: 10.5334/pb.1189.


Reading vertically and horizontally mirrored text: An eye movement investigation.

Pittrich K, Schroeder S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022; 76(2):271-283.

PMID: 35230211 PMC: 9896260. DOI: 10.1177/17470218221085943.


References
1.
Rayner K, Liversedge S, White S . Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation. Vision Res. 2005; 46(3):310-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.018. View

2.
Paterson K, A McGowan V, Jordan T . Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: evidence from eye movements. PeerJ. 2013; 1:e63. PMC: 3642708. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.63. View

3.
Risse S, Kliegl R . Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychol Aging. 2011; 26(2):451-60. DOI: 10.1037/a0021616. View

4.
Schotter E, Angele B, Rayner K . Parafoveal processing in reading. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011; 74(1):5-35. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2. View

5.
Rayner K, Sereno S, Raney G . Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22(5):1188-200. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1188. View