» Articles » PMID: 30671009

Adult Age Differences in Effects of Text Spacing on Eye Movements During Reading

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2019 Jan 24
PMID 30671009
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large-scale changes in text spacing, such as removing the spaces between words, disrupt reading more for older (65+ years) than younger (18-30 years) adults. However, it is unknown whether older readers show greater sensitivity to simultaneous subtle changes in inter-letter and inter-word spacing encountered in everyday reading. To investigate this, we recorded young and older adults' eye movements while reading sentences in which inter-letter and inter-word spacing was normal, condensed (10 and 20% smaller than normal), or expanded (10 or 20% larger than normal). Each sentence included either a high or low frequency target word, matched for length and contextual predictability. Condensing but not expanding text spacing disrupted reading more for the older adults. Moreover, word frequency effects (the reading time cost for low compared to high frequency words) were larger for the older adults, consistent with aging effects on lexical processing in previous research. However, this age difference in the word frequency effect did not vary across spacing conditions, suggesting spacing did not further disrupt older readers' lexical processing. We conclude that visual rather than lexical processing is disrupted more for older readers when text spacing is condensed and discuss this finding in relation to common age-related visual deficits.

Citing Articles

Visual search patterns for multilingual word search puzzles, a pilot study.

Beelders T J Eye Mov Res. 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 38022899 PMC: 10644992. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.16.1.6.


The role of visual crowding in eye movements during reading: Effects of text spacing.

Chiu T, Drieghe D Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(8):2834-2858.

PMID: 37821744 PMC: 10600290. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02787-1.


Contextual Support for Less Salient Homophones and Pun Humor Appreciation: Evidence From Eye Movements in Reading Chinese Homophone Puns.

Zheng W, Wang X Front Psychol. 2022; 13:875479.

PMID: 35645913 PMC: 9131095. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875479.


Are older adults more risky readers? Evidence from meta-analysis.

Zhang J, Warrington K, Li L, Pagan A, Paterson K, White S Psychol Aging. 2022; 37(2):239-259.

PMID: 35099245 PMC: 8867715. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000522.


Wider Letter-Spacing Facilitates Word Processing but Impairs Reading Rates of Fast Readers.

Korinth S, Gerstenberger K, Fiebach C Front Psychol. 2020; 11:444.

PMID: 32256428 PMC: 7090332. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00444.


References
1.
Chung S . The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(4):1270-6. View

2.
De Luca M, Judica A, Zoccolotti P . Crowding effects on word identification in developmental dyslexia. Cortex. 2002; 38(2):179-200. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70649-x. View

3.
Ryan J, Sattler J, Lopez S . Age effects on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III subtests. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 15(4):311-7. View

4.
Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53(4):695-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. View

5.
Bopp K, Verhaeghen P . Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005; 60(5):P223-33. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/60.5.p223. View