Understanding Students' and Clinicians' Experiences of Informal Interprofessional Workplace Learning: an Australian Qualitative Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: While postgraduate studies have begun to shed light on informal interprofessional workplace learning, studies with preregistration learners have typically focused on formal and structured work-based learning. The current study investigated preregistration students' informal interprofessional workplace learning by exploring students' and clinicians' experiences of interprofessional student-clinician (IPSC) interactions.
Design: A qualitative interview study using narrative techniques was conducted.
Setting: Student placements across multiple clinical sites in Victoria, Australia.
Participants: Through maximum variation sampling, 61 participants (38 students and 23 clinicians) were recruited from six professions (medicine, midwifery, nursing, occupational therapy, paramedicine and physiotherapy).
Methods: We conducted 12 group and 10 individual semistructured interviews. Themes were identified through framework analysis, and the similarities and differences in subthemes by participant group were interrogated.
Results: Six themes relating to four research questions were identified: (1) conceptualisations of IPSC interactions; (2) context for interaction experiences; (3) the nature of interaction experiences; (4) factors contributing to positive or negative interactions; (5) positive or negative consequences of interactions and (6) suggested improvements for IPSC interactions. Seven noteworthy differences in subthemes between students and clinicians and across the professions were identified.
Conclusions: Despite the results largely supporting previous postgraduate research, the findings illustrate greater breadth and depth of understandings, experiences and suggestions for preregistration education. Educators and students are encouraged to seek opportunities for informal interprofessional learning afforded by the workplace.
Culture and context in Interprofessional education: Expectations in Australia and Japan.
Kent F, Haruta J Med Educ. 2024; 59(1):83-87.
PMID: 38728120 PMC: 11662292. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15424.
An Interprofessional Faculty Development Program for Workplace-Based Learning.
Booij E, van Dam M, Jonker G, van Bruggen L, Lesterhuis M, van der Schaaf M Perspect Med Educ. 2024; 13(1):266-273.
PMID: 38706455 PMC: 11067978. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1242.
Otter S, Whitham D, Riley P, Coughtrey J, Whitham S J Foot Ankle Res. 2023; 16(1):7.
PMID: 36800975 PMC: 9939373. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00607-1.
Cerbin-Koczorowska M, Przymuszala P, Klos M, Bazan D, Zebryk P, Uruski P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(24).
PMID: 36554834 PMC: 9779563. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416955.
Stalmeijer R Mil Med. 2021; 186(Suppl 3):48-50.
PMID: 34724054 PMC: 8559908. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab234.