» Articles » PMID: 29661165

Midwives' Perceptions on Using a Fetoscope and Doppler for Fetal Heart Rate Assessments During Labor: a Qualitative Study in Rural Tanzania

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Apr 18
PMID 29661165
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Doppler is thought to be more comfortable and effective compared to the fetoscope for assessing the fetal heart rate (FHR) during labor. However, in a rural Tanzanian hospital, midwives who had easy access to both devices mostly used fetoscope. This study explored midwives' perception of factors influencing their preference for using either a Pinard fetoscope or a FreePlay wind-up Doppler for intermittent FHR monitoring.

Methods: Midwives who had worked for at least 6 months in the labor ward were recruited. Focus group discussion (FGD) was used to collect data. Five FGDs were conducted between December 2015 and February 2016. Qualitative content analysis was employed using NVivo 11.0.

Results: Three main themes emerged as factors perceived by midwives as influencing their preference; 1) Sufficient training and experience with using a device; Midwives had been using fetoscopes since their midwifery training, and they had vast experience using it. The Doppler was recently introduced in the maternity ward, and midwives had insufficient training in how to use it. 2) Ability of the device to produce reliable measurements; Using a fetoscope, one must listen for the heartbeat, count using a watch, and calculate, the Doppler provides both a display and sound of the FHR. Fetoscope measurements are prone to human errors, and Doppler measurements are prone to instrumental errors. 3) Convenience of use and comfort of a device; Fetoscopes do not need charging, and while it is possible to "personalize/hide" the measurements, and may be painful for mothers. Dopplers need charging and do not cause pain, but provide limited privacy.

Conclusion: Midwives' preferences of FHR monitoring devices are influenced by the level of device training, experience with using a device, reliable measurements, and convenience and comfort during use. Fetoscopes and Dopplers should be equally available during midwifery training and in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Implementation barriers and facilitators of Moyo foetal heart rate monitor during labour in public hospitals in Nepal.

Kc A, Ronnback M, Humgain U, Basnet O, Bhattarai P, Axelin A Glob Health Action. 2024; 17(1):2328894.

PMID: 38577869 PMC: 11000597. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2328894.


The perspectives of nurse-midwives and doctors on clinical challenges of prolonged labor: A qualitative study from Tanzania.

Hoifodt A, Huurnink J, Egenberg S, Massay D, Mchome B, Eri T Eur J Midwifery. 2022; 6:61.

PMID: 36187168 PMC: 9483773. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/152747.


SaferBirths bundle of care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster implementation project in 30 public health-facilities in five regions, Tanzania.

Kamala B, Ersdal H, Mduma E, Moshiro R, Girnary S, Ostrem O BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):1117.

PMID: 34663296 PMC: 8524841. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07145-1.


Scale-Up of Doppler to Improve Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in Tanzania: A Qualitative Assessment of National and Regional/District Level Implementation Factors.

Plotkin M, George J, Bundala F, Tibaijuka G, Njonge L, Lemwayi R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6).

PMID: 32188037 PMC: 7142453. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061931.


Systematic review of Doppler for detecting intrapartum fetal heart abnormalities and measuring perinatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries.

Plotkin M, Kamala B, Ricca J, Fogarty L, Currie S, Kidanto H Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019; 148(2):145-156.

PMID: 31646629 PMC: 7004154. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13014.


References
1.
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte G, Cuthbert A . Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 2:CD006066. PMC: 6464257. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3. View

2.
Feinstein N . Fetal heart rate auscultation: current and future practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2000; 29(3):306-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2000.tb02052.x. View

3.
Byaruhanga R, Bassani D, Jagau A, Muwanguzi P, Montgomery A, Lawn J . Use of wind-up fetal Doppler versus Pinard for fetal heart rate intermittent monitoring in labour: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(1):e006867. PMC: 4316429. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006867. View

4.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

5.
Ersdal H, Mduma E, Svensen E, Sundby J, Perlman J . Intermittent detection of fetal heart rate abnormalities identify infants at greatest risk for fresh stillbirths, birth asphyxia, neonatal resuscitation, and early neonatal deaths in a limited-resource setting: a prospective descriptive.... Neonatology. 2012; 102(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1159/000339481. View