» Articles » PMID: 32188037

Scale-Up of Doppler to Improve Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in Tanzania: A Qualitative Assessment of National and Regional/District Level Implementation Factors

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Mar 20
PMID 32188037
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-quality intrapartum care, including intermittent monitoring of fetal heart rates (FHR) to detect and manage abnormalities, is recommended by WHO and the Government of Tanzania (GoT) and creates potential to save newborn lives in Tanzania. Handheld Doppler devices have been investigated in several low-resource countries as an alternative to Pinard stethoscope and are more sensitive to detecting accelerations and decelerations of the fetal heart as compared to Pinard. This study assessed perspectives of high-level Tanzanian policymakers on facilitators and barriers to scaling up use of the hand-held Doppler for assessing FHR during labor and delivery. From November 2018-August 2019, nine high-level policymakers and subject matter experts were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire, with theoretical domains drawn from Proctor's implementation outcomes framework. Interviewees largely saw use of Doppler to improve intrapartum FHR monitoring as aligning with national priorities, though they noted competing demands for resources. They felt that GoT should fund Doppler, but prioritization and budgeting should be driven from district level. Recommended ways forward included learning from scale up of Helping Babies Breathe rollout, making training approaches effective, using clinical mentoring, and establishing systematic monitoring of outcomes. To be most effective, introduction of Doppler must be concurrent with improving case management practices for abnormal intrapartum FHR. WHO's guidance on scale-up, as well as implementation science frameworks, should be considered to guide implementation and evaluation.

Citing Articles

Situation of labour room documentation at secondary level public health facilities of Cuttack district, Odisha, India - A SWOT analysis.

Palo S, Kripalini P, Sanghamitra P J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(7):3308-3314.

PMID: 33102288 PMC: 7567242. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_376_20.

References
1.
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Bianchi Jassir F, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C . National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4(2):e98-e108. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. View

2.
Cavicchiolo M, Cavallin F, Bertuola F, Pizzol D, Segafredo G, Wingi O . Effect of a Low-Dose/High-Frequency Training on Real-Life Neonatal Resuscitation in a Low-Resource Setting. Neonatology. 2018; 114(4):294-302. DOI: 10.1159/000490370. View

3.
Bhutta Z, Das J, Bahl R, Lawn J, Salam R, Paul V . Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?. Lancet. 2014; 384(9940):347-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3. View

4.
Hodgins S, Valsangkar B, Patterson J, Wall S, Riggs-Perla J . Caution needed to avoid empty scale-up of Kangaroo Mother Care in low-income settings. J Glob Health. 2018; 8(1):010306. PMC: 6005400. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.010306. View

5.
Ersdal H, Mduma E, Svensen E, Sundby J, Perlman J . Intermittent detection of fetal heart rate abnormalities identify infants at greatest risk for fresh stillbirths, birth asphyxia, neonatal resuscitation, and early neonatal deaths in a limited-resource setting: a prospective descriptive.... Neonatology. 2012; 102(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1159/000339481. View