» Articles » PMID: 29648592

Yeast 2.0-connecting the Dots in the Construction of the World's First Functional Synthetic Eukaryotic Genome

Overview
Journal FEMS Yeast Res
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2018 Apr 13
PMID 29648592
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Historians of the future may well describe 2018 as the year that the world's first functional synthetic eukaryotic genome became a reality. Without the benefit of hindsight, it might be hard to completely grasp the long-term significance of a breakthrough moment in the history of science like this. The role of synthetic biology in the imminent birth of a budding Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cell carrying 16 man-made chromosomes causes the world of science to teeter on the threshold of a future-defining scientific frontier. The genome-engineering tools and technologies currently being developed to produce the ultimate yeast genome will irreversibly connect the dots between our improved understanding of the fundamentals of a complex cell containing its DNA in a specialised nucleus and the application of bioengineered eukaryotes designed for advanced biomanufacturing of beneficial products. By joining up the dots between the findings and learnings from the international Synthetic Yeast Genome project (known as the Yeast 2.0 or Sc2.0 project) and concurrent advancements in biodesign tools and smart data-intensive technologies, a future world powered by a thriving bioeconomy seems realistic. This global project demonstrates how a collaborative network of dot connectors-driven by a tinkerer's indomitable curiosity to understand how things work inside a eukaryotic cell-are using cutting-edge biodesign concepts and synthetic biology tools to advance science and to positively frame human futures (i.e. improved quality of life) in a planetary context (i.e. a sustainable environment). Explorations such as this have a rich history of resulting in unexpected discoveries and unanticipated applications for the benefit of people and planet. However, we must learn from past explorations into controversial futuristic sciences and ensure that researchers at the forefront of an emerging science such as synthetic biology remain connected to all stakeholders' concerns about the biosafety, bioethics and regulatory aspects of their pioneering work. This article presents a shared vision of constructing a synthetic eukaryotic genome in a safe model organism by using novel concepts and advanced technologies. This multidisciplinary and collaborative project is conducted under a sound governance structure that does not only respect the scientific achievements and lessons from the past, but that is also focussed on leading the present and helping to secure a brighter future for all.

Citing Articles

Construction and iterative redesign of synXVI a 903 kb synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome.

Goold H, Kroukamp H, Erpf P, Zhao Y, Kelso P, Calame J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):841.

PMID: 39833175 PMC: 11747415. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55318-3.


Following the organism to map synthetic genomics.

Hey M, Szymanski E Biotechnol Notes. 2024; 3:50-53.

PMID: 39416453 PMC: 11446350. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotno.2022.07.001.


What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?.

Bhunjun C, Chen Y, Phukhamsakda C, Boekhout T, Groenewald J, McKenzie E Stud Mycol. 2024; 108:1-411.

PMID: 39100921 PMC: 11293126. DOI: 10.3114/sim.2024.108.01.


An Optimized Genotyping Workflow for Identifying Highly SCRaMbLEd Synthetic Yeasts.

Lindeboom T, Sanchez Olmos M, Schulz K, Brinkmann C, Ramirez Rojas A, Hochrein L ACS Synth Biol. 2024; 13(4):1116-1127.

PMID: 38597458 PMC: 11036488. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00476.


Building Synthetic Cells─From the Technology Infrastructure to Cellular Entities.

Rothschild L, Averesch N, Strychalski E, Moser F, Glass J, Cruz Perez R ACS Synth Biol. 2024; 13(4):974-997.

PMID: 38530077 PMC: 11037263. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00724.


References
1.
Richardson S, Mitchell L, Stracquadanio G, Yang K, Dymond J, DiCarlo J . Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science. 2017; 355(6329):1040-1044. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf4557. View

2.
Williams T, Pretorius I, Paulsen I . Synthetic Evolution of Metabolic Productivity Using Biosensors. Trends Biotechnol. 2016; 34(5):371-381. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.002. View

3.
Hutchison 3rd C, Chuang R, Noskov V, Assad-Garcia N, Deerinck T, Ellisman M . Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science. 2016; 351(6280):aad6253. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad6253. View

4.
Oliver S . From DNA sequence to biological function. Nature. 1996; 379(6566):597-600. DOI: 10.1038/379597a0. View

5.
Gibson D, Benders G, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Denisova E, Baden-Tillson H, Zaveri J . Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science. 2008; 319(5867):1215-20. DOI: 10.1126/science.1151721. View