» Articles » PMID: 29642840

ISeg: an Efficient Algorithm for Segmentation of Genomic and Epigenomic Data

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Apr 13
PMID 29642840
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identification of functional elements of a genome often requires dividing a sequence of measurements along a genome into segments where adjacent segments have different properties, such as different mean values. Despite dozens of algorithms developed to address this problem in genomics research, methods with improved accuracy and speed are still needed to effectively tackle both existing and emerging genomic and epigenomic segmentation problems.

Results: We designed an efficient algorithm, called iSeg, for segmentation of genomic and epigenomic profiles. iSeg first utilizes dynamic programming to identify candidate segments and test for significance. It then uses a novel data structure based on two coupled balanced binary trees to detect overlapping significant segments and update them simultaneously during searching and refinement stages. Refinement and merging of significant segments are performed at the end to generate the final set of segments. By using an objective function based on the p-values of the segments, the algorithm can serve as a general computational framework to be combined with different assumptions on the distributions of the data. As a general segmentation method, it can segment different types of genomic and epigenomic data, such as DNA copy number variation, nucleosome occupancy, nuclease sensitivity, and differential nuclease sensitivity data. Using simple t-tests to compute p-values across multiple datasets of different types, we evaluate iSeg using both simulated and experimental datasets and show that it performs satisfactorily when compared with some other popular methods, which often employ more sophisticated statistical models. Implemented in C++, iSeg is also very computationally efficient, well suited for large numbers of input profiles and data with very long sequences.

Conclusions: We have developed an efficient general-purpose segmentation tool and showed that it had comparable or more accurate results than many of the most popular segment-calling algorithms used in contemporary genomic data analysis. iSeg is capable of analyzing datasets that have both positive and negative values. Tunable parameters allow users to readily adjust the statistical stringency to best match the biological nature of individual datasets, including widely or sparsely mapped genomic datasets or those with non-normal distributions.

Citing Articles

Evolutionary Dynamics of Chromatin Structure and Duplicate Gene Expression in Diploid and Allopolyploid Cotton.

Hu G, Grover C, Vera D, Lung P, Girimurugan S, Miller E Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(5).

PMID: 38758089 PMC: 11140268. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae095.


DeepRegFinder: deep learning-based regulatory elements finder.

Ramakrishnan A, Wangensteen G, Kim S, Nestler E, Shen L Bioinform Adv. 2024; 4(1):vbae007.

PMID: 38343388 PMC: 10858349. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae007.


Segmentation and genome annotation algorithms for identifying chromatin state and other genomic patterns.

Libbrecht M, Chan R, Hoffman M PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(10):e1009423.

PMID: 34648491 PMC: 8516206. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009423.


NucHMM: a method for quantitative modeling of nucleosome organization identifying functional nucleosome states distinctly associated with splicing potentiality.

Fang K, Li T, Huang Y, Jin V Genome Biol. 2021; 22(1):250.

PMID: 34446075 PMC: 8390234. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02465-1.


The native cistrome and sequence motif families of the maize ear.

Savadel S, Hartwig T, Turpin Z, Vera D, Lung P, Sui X PLoS Genet. 2021; 17(8):e1009689.

PMID: 34383745 PMC: 8360572. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009689.


References
1.
Kharchenko P, Tolstorukov M, Park P . Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26(12):1351-9. PMC: 2597701. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1508. View

2.
Roy S, Motsinger Reif A . Evaluation of calling algorithms for array-CGH. Front Genet. 2013; 4:217. PMC: 3829466. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00217. View

3.
Vera D, Madzima T, Labonne J, Alam M, Hoffman G, Girimurugan S . Differential nuclease sensitivity profiling of chromatin reveals biochemical footprints coupled to gene expression and functional DNA elements in maize. Plant Cell. 2014; 26(10):3883-93. PMC: 4247582. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.130609. View

4.
Hoffman M, Ernst J, Wilder S, Kundaje A, Harris R, Libbrecht M . Integrative annotation of chromatin elements from ENCODE data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(2):827-41. PMC: 3553955. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1284. View

5.
Niu Y, Zhang H . THE SCREENING AND RANKING ALGORITHM TO DETECT DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS. Ann Appl Stat. 2013; 6(3):1306-1326. PMC: 3779928. DOI: 10.1214/12-AOAS539SUPP. View