» Articles » PMID: 29635542

Targeted Methylation Sequencing of Plasma Cell-free DNA for Cancer Detection and Classification

Abstract

Background: Targeted methylation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has a potential to expand liquid biopsies to patients with tumors without detectable oncogenic alterations, which can be potentially useful in early diagnosis.

Patients And Methods: We developed a comprehensive methylation sequencing assay targeting 9223 CpG sites consistently hypermethylated according to The Cancer Genome Atlas. Next, we carried out a clinical validation of our method using plasma cfDNA samples from 78 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer or melanoma and compared results with patients' outcomes.

Results: Median methylation scores in plasma cfDNA samples from patients on therapy were lower than from patients off therapy (4.74 versus 85.29; P = 0.001). Of 68 plasma samples from patients off therapy, methylation scores detected the presence of cancer in 57 (83.8%), and methylation-based signatures accurately classified the underlying cancer type in 45 (78.9%) of these. Methylation scores were most accurate in detecting colorectal cancer (96.3%), followed by breast cancer (91.7%), melanoma (81.8%) and NSCLC (61.1%), and most accurate in classifying the underlying cancer type in colorectal cancer (88.5%), followed by NSCLC (81.8%), breast cancer (72.7%) and melanoma (55.6%). Low methylation scores versus high were associated with longer survival (10.4 versus 4.4 months, P < 0.001) and longer time-to-treatment failure (2.8 versus 1.6 months, P = 0.016).

Conclusions: Comprehensive targeted methylation sequencing of 9223 CpG sites in plasma cfDNA from patients with common advanced cancers detects the presence of cancer and underlying cancer type with high accuracy. Methylation scores in plasma cfDNA correspond with treatment outcomes.

Citing Articles

The epigenetic basis of hepatocellular carcinoma - mechanisms and potential directions for biomarkers and therapeutics.

Lin H, Jeon A, Chen K, Lee C, Wu L, Chong S Br J Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 40057667 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-025-02969-8.


Advancements in precision oncology: Investigating the function of circulating DNA in the advancement of liquid biopsy technologies.

Baruah S, Rajak J, Mitra A, Dhara B J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 5:100157.

PMID: 40027946 PMC: 11863923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100157.


Liquid biopsy into the clinics: Current evidence and future perspectives.

Boukovala M, Westphalen C, Probst V J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 4:100146.

PMID: 40027149 PMC: 11863819. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100146.


5-hydroxymethylcytosine features of portal venous blood predict metachronous liver metastases of colorectal cancer and reveal phosphodiesterase 4 as a therapeutic target.

Xu N, Gao Z, Wu D, Chen H, Zhang Z, Zhang L Clin Transl Med. 2025; 15(2):e70189.

PMID: 39956959 PMC: 11830572. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70189.


Characterizing DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation in Cord Blood and Identifying Sex-Specific Differences using the Illumina EPIC Array.

Petroff R, Dolinoy D, Padmanabhan V, Goodrich J Epigenet Rep. 2024; 2(1):1-7.

PMID: 39610770 PMC: 11600988. DOI: 10.1080/28361512.2024.2427955.


References
1.
Fujii T, Barzi A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Cassingena A, Siravegna G, Karp D . Mutation-Enrichment Next-Generation Sequencing for Quantitative Detection of Mutations in Urine Cell-Free DNA from Patients with Advanced Cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(14):3657-3666. PMC: 5511562. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2592. View

2.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

3.
Hinoue T, Weisenberger D, Lange C, Shen H, Byun H, van den Berg D . Genome-scale analysis of aberrant DNA methylation in colorectal cancer. Genome Res. 2011; 22(2):271-82. PMC: 3266034. DOI: 10.1101/gr.117523.110. View

4.
Cai X, Janku F, Zhan Q, Fan J . Accessing Genetic Information with Liquid Biopsies. Trends Genet. 2015; 31(10):564-575. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.06.001. View

5.
Arkenau H, Barriuso J, Olmos D, Ang J, de Bono J, Judson I . Prospective validation of a prognostic score to improve patient selection for oncology phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(16):2692-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5081. View