» Articles » PMID: 37223690

Multimodal Analysis of Genome-wide Methylation, Copy Number Aberrations, and End Motif Signatures Enhances Detection of Early-stage Breast Cancer

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer causes the most cancer-related death in women and is the costliest cancer in the US regarding medical service and prescription drug expenses. Breast cancer screening is recommended by health authorities in the US, but current screening efforts are often compromised by high false positive rates. Liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential approach to screen for cancer. However, the detection of breast cancer, particularly in early stages, is challenging due to the low amount of ctDNA and heterogeneity of molecular subtypes.

Methods: Here, we employed a multimodal approach, namely Screen for the Presence of Tumor by DNA Methylation and Size (SPOT-MAS), to simultaneously analyze multiple signatures of cell free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma samples of 239 nonmetastatic breast cancer patients and 278 healthy subjects.

Results: We identified distinct profiles of genome-wide methylation changes (GWM), copy number alterations (CNA), and 4-nucleotide oligomer (4-mer) end motifs (EM) in cfDNA of breast cancer patients. We further used all three signatures to construct a multi-featured machine learning model and showed that the combination model outperformed base models built from individual features, achieving an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), a sensitivity of 65% at 96% specificity.

Discussion: Our findings showed that a multimodal liquid biopsy assay based on analysis of cfDNA methylation, CNA and EM could enhance the accuracy for the detection of early- stage breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Prospective validation study: a non-invasive circulating tumor DNA-based assay for simultaneous early detection of multiple cancers in asymptomatic adults.

Nguyen L, Nguyen T, Le V, Bui V, Nguyen L, Pham N BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):90.

PMID: 39948555 PMC: 11827191. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03929-y.


Cell-free epigenomes enhanced fragmentomics-based model for early detection of lung cancer.

Wang Y, Guo Q, Huang Z, Song L, Zhao F, Gu T Clin Transl Med. 2025; 15(2):e70225.

PMID: 39909829 PMC: 11798665. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70225.


Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cell-free-DNA-based diagnostics.

Tsui W, Ding S, Jiang P, Lo Y Genome Res. 2025; 35(1):1-19.

PMID: 39843210 PMC: 11789496. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278413.123.


A consultation and work-up diagnosis protocol for a multicancer early detection test: a case series study.

Nguyen L, Tieu B, Nguyen T, Ha N, Nguyen G, Nguyen T Future Sci OA. 2024; 10(1):2395244.

PMID: 39254097 PMC: 11389743. DOI: 10.1080/20565623.2024.2395244.


Tissue of origin detection for cancer tumor using low-depth cfDNA samples through combination of tumor-specific methylation atlas and genome-wide methylation density in graph convolutional neural networks.

Nguyen T, Doan N, Tran T, Huynh L, Doan P, Nguyen T J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):618.

PMID: 38961476 PMC: 11223394. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05416-z.


References
1.
Jiang P, Sun K, Peng W, Cheng S, Ni M, Yeung P . Plasma DNA End-Motif Profiling as a Fragmentomic Marker in Cancer, Pregnancy, and Transplantation. Cancer Discov. 2020; 10(5):664-673. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0622. View

2.
Escudero L, Martinez-Ricarte F, Seoane J . ctDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cerebrospinal Fluid in Brain Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(9). PMC: 8122255. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13091989. View

3.
Bernardino J, Roux C, Almeida A, Vogt N, Gibaud A, Gerbault-Seureau M . DNA hypomethylation in breast cancer: an independent parameter of tumor progression?. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997; 97(2):83-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(96)00385-8. View

4.
Szyf M, Pakneshan P, Rabbani S . DNA methylation and breast cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004; 68(6):1187-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.04.030. View

5.
Ades F, Zardavas D, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Pugliano L, Fumagalli D, de Azambuja E . Luminal B breast cancer: molecular characterization, clinical management, and future perspectives. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(25):2794-803. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.1870. View