» Articles » PMID: 29609007

Intra-hemispheric Integration Underlies Perception of Tilt Illusion

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Apr 3
PMID 29609007
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The integration of inputs across the entire visual field into a single conscious experience is fundamental to human visual perception. This integrated nature of visual experience is illustrated by contextual illusions such as the tilt illusion, in which the perceived orientation of a central grating appears tilted away from its physical orientation, due to the modulation by a surrounding grating with a different orientation. Here we investigated the relative contribution of local, intra-hemispheric and global, inter-hemispheric integration mechanisms to perception of the tilt illusion. We used Dynamic Causal Modelling of fMRI signals to estimate effective connectivity in human early visual cortices (V1, V2, V3) during bilateral presentation of a tilt illusion stimulus. Our analysis revealed that neural responses associated with the tilt illusion were modulated by intra- rather than inter-hemispheric connectivity. Crucially, across participants, intra-hemispheric connectivity in V1 correlated with the magnitude of the tilt illusion, while no such correlation was observed for V1 inter-hemispheric connectivity, or V2, V3 connectivity. Moreover, when the illusion stimulus was presented unilaterally rather than bilaterally, the illusion magnitude did not change. Together our findings suggest that perception of the tilt illusion reflects an intra-hemispheric integration mechanism. This is in contrast to the existing literature, which suggests inter-hemispheric modulation of neural activity as early as V1. This discrepancy with our findings may reflect the diversity and complexity of integration mechanisms involved in visual processing and visual perception.

Citing Articles

Moderate Alcohol Intake Changes Visual Perception by Enhancing V1 Inhibitory Surround Interactions.

Wang H, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Tzvetanov T Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:682229.

PMID: 34290580 PMC: 8287857. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.682229.


Improved fidelity of orientation perception: a learning effect dissociable from enhanced discriminability.

Zhang E, Li W Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):6572.

PMID: 32313001 PMC: 7171124. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62882-3.


Touch engages visual spatial contextual processing.

Perez-Bellido A, Pappal R, Yau J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16637.

PMID: 30413736 PMC: 6226493. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34810-z.

References
1.
Ringach D, Shapley R, Hawken M . Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(13):5639-51. PMC: 6758222. DOI: 20026567. View

2.
Kaskan P, Lu H, Dillenburger B, Kaas J, Roe A . The organization of orientation-selective, luminance-change and binocular- preference domains in the second (V2) and third (V3) visual areas of New World owl monkeys as revealed by intrinsic signal optical imaging. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 19(6):1394-407. PMC: 2677652. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn178. View

3.
Rosanova M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S, Boly M, Casali A, Bruno M . Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain. 2012; 135(Pt 4):1308-20. PMC: 3326248. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr340. View

4.
Friston K . Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 2012; 1(1):13-36. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008. View

5.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor. J Comp Neurol. 1974; 158(3):295-305. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901580305. View