» Articles » PMID: 24285885

Effective Connectivity Within Human Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Interindividual Diversity in Illusory Perception

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Nov 29
PMID 24285885
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual perception depends strongly on spatial context. A classic example is the tilt illusion where the perceived orientation of a central stimulus differs from its physical orientation when surrounded by tilted spatial contexts. Here we show that such contextual modulation of orientation perception exhibits trait-like interindividual diversity that correlates with interindividual differences in effective connectivity within human primary visual cortex. We found that the degree to which spatial contexts induced illusory orientation perception, namely, the magnitude of the tilt illusion, varied across healthy human adults in a trait-like fashion independent of stimulus size or contrast. Parallel to contextual modulation of orientation perception, the presence of spatial contexts affected effective connectivity within human primary visual cortex between peripheral and foveal representations that responded to spatial context and central stimulus, respectively. Importantly, this effective connectivity from peripheral to foveal primary visual cortex correlated with interindividual differences in the magnitude of the tilt illusion. Moreover, this correlation with illusion perception was observed for effective connectivity under tilted contextual stimulation but not for that under iso-oriented contextual stimulation, suggesting that it reflected the impact of orientation-dependent intra-areal connections. Our findings revealed an interindividual correlation between intra-areal connectivity within primary visual cortex and contextual influence on orientation perception. This neurophysiological-perceptual link provides empirical evidence for theoretical proposals that intra-areal connections in early visual cortices are involved in contextual modulation of visual perception.

Citing Articles

Cortical depth profiles in primary visual cortex for illusory and imaginary experiences.

Bergmann J, Petro L, Abbatecola C, Li M, Morgan A, Muckli L Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1002.

PMID: 38307834 PMC: 10837448. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45065-w.


Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.

Urale P, Schwarzkopf D Perception. 2023; 52(7):459-483.

PMID: 37335155 PMC: 10291393. DOI: 10.1177/03010066231175014.


Contributions of low- and high-level contextual mechanisms to human face perception.

Canoluk M, Moors P, Goffaux V PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285255.

PMID: 37130144 PMC: 10153715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285255.


Same stimulus, same temporal context, different percept? Individual differences in hysteresis and adaptation when perceiving multistable dot lattices.

Van Geert E, Moors P, Haaf J, Wagemans J Iperception. 2022; 13(4):20416695221109300.

PMID: 35836701 PMC: 9274434. DOI: 10.1177/20416695221109300.


From Neurodevelopmental to Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Vascular Continuum.

Ouellette J, Lacoste B Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13:749026.

PMID: 34744690 PMC: 8570842. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.749026.


References
1.
Sereno M, Dale A, Reppas J, Kwong K, Belliveau J, Brady T . Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1995; 268(5212):889-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.7754376. View

2.
Bair W, Cavanaugh J, Movshon J . Time course and time-distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(20):7690-701. PMC: 6740744. View

3.
Dragoi V, Sur M . Dynamic properties of recurrent inhibition in primary visual cortex: contrast and orientation dependence of contextual effects. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83(2):1019-30. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.1019. View

4.
Gerstein G, PERKEL D . Simultaneously recorded trains of action potentials: analysis and functional interpretation. Science. 1969; 164(3881):828-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.164.3881.828. View

5.
Friston K, Harrison L, Penny W . Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(4):1273-302. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7. View