» Articles » PMID: 29603147

Timely Follow-up of Positive Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium

Abstract

Timely follow-up for positive cancer screening results remains suboptimal, and the evidence base to inform decisions on optimizing the timeliness of diagnostic testing is unclear. This systematic review evaluated published studies regarding time to follow-up after a positive screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. The quality of available evidence was very low or low across cancers, with potential attenuated or reversed associations from confounding by indication in most studies. Overall, evidence suggested that the risk for poorer cancer outcomes rises with longer wait times that vary within and across cancer types, which supports performing diagnostic testing as soon as feasible after the positive result, but evidence for specific time targets is limited. Within these limitations, we provide our opinion on cancer-specific recommendations for times to follow-up and how existing guidelines relate to the current evidence. Thresholds set should consider patient worry, potential for loss to follow-up with prolonged wait times, and available resources. Research is needed to better guide the timeliness of diagnostic follow-up, including considerations for patient preferences and existing barriers, while addressing methodological weaknesses. Research is also needed to identify effective interventions for reducing wait times for diagnostic testing, particularly in underserved or low-resource settings. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:199-216. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Citing Articles

Housing Status and Cancer Screening in US Veterans.

Decker H, Graham L, Titan A, Hawn M, Kushel M, Kanzaria H J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40011415 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09098-7.


The roles of LncRNA CARMN in cancers: biomarker potential, therapeutic targeting, and immune response.

Liu H, Liu X, Lu Y Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):776.

PMID: 39692999 PMC: 11655820. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01679-6.


Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer in two Indiana healthcare systems.

Richter B, Roth S, Golzarri-Arroyo L, Kumar V, Tuason R, Imperiale T Prev Med Rep. 2024; 49:102937.

PMID: 39691357 PMC: 11648236. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102937.


Clinical research framework proposal for ketogenic metabolic therapy in glioblastoma.

Duraj T, Kalamian M, Zuccoli G, Maroon J, DAgostino D, Scheck A BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):578.

PMID: 39639257 PMC: 11622503. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03775-4.


Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Reuland D, OLeary M, Crockett S, Farr D, Ferrari R, Malo T JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(11):e2446693.

PMID: 39585696 PMC: 11589799. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.


References
1.
Beaber E, Kim J, Schapira M, Tosteson A, Zauber A, Geiger A . Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107(6):djv120. PMC: 4838064. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv120. View

2.
Olivotto I, Gomi A, Bancej C, Brisson J, Tonita J, Kan L . Influence of delay to diagnosis on prognostic indicators of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002; 94(8):2143-50. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10453. View

3.
Ost D, Yeung S, Tanoue L, Gould M . Clinical and organizational factors in the initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143(5 Suppl):e121S-e141S. PMC: 4694609. DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2352. View

4.
Kaplan G . Health Care Scheduling and Access: A Report From the IOM. JAMA. 2015; 314(14):1449-50. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.9431. View

5.
Sterne J, Hernan M, Reeves B, Savovic J, Berkman N, Viswanathan M . ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. PMC: 5062054. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. View