» Articles » PMID: 36946690

Impact of HPV Testing in Opportunistic Cervical Screening: Support for Primary HPV Screening in the United States

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Mar 22
PMID 36946690
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening increases diagnosis of precancer and reduces the incidence of cervical cancer more than cytology alone. However, real-world evidence from diverse practice settings is lacking for the United States (U.S.) to support clinician adoption of primary HPV screening. Using a population-based registry, which captures all cervical cytology (with or without HPV testing) and all cervical biopsies, we conducted a real-world evidence study of screening in women aged 30 to 64 years across the entire state of New Mexico. Negative cytology was used to distinguish cotests from reflex HPV tests. A total of 264 198 cervical screening tests (with exclusions based on clinical history) were recorded as the first screening test between 2014 and 2017. Diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or 3 or greater (CIN2+, CIN3+) from 2014 to 2019 were the main outcomes. Of cytology-negative screens, 165 595 (67.1%) were cotests and 4.8% of these led to biopsy within 2 years vs 3.2% in the cytology-only group. Among cytology-negative, HPV tested women, 347 of 398 (87.2%) CIN2+ cases were diagnosed in HPV-positive women, as were 147 of 164 (89.6%) CIN3+ cases. Only 29/921 (3.2%) CIN3+ and 67/1964 (3.4%) CIN2+ cases were diagnosed in HPV-negative, cytology-positive women with biopsies. Under U.S. opportunistic screening, across a diversity of health care delivery practices, and in a population suffering multiple disparities, we show adding HPV testing to cytology substantially increased the yield of CIN2+ and CIN3+. CIN3+ was rarely diagnosed in HPV-negative women with abnormal cytology, supporting U.S. primary HPV-only screening.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and Description of High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesions of Cervical Mucosa Cells in a Screening Programme for Cervical Cancer in Isère, France.

Balamou C, Zysman K, Olicard C, Garnier A, Seigneurin A Cancer Med. 2024; 13(19):e70259.

PMID: 39400464 PMC: 11472336. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70259.


Promise and Perils of Primary HPV Testing.

Spencer J, Wheeler C Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(8):982-983.

PMID: 39086313 PMC: 11292190. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0716.


Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Gottschlich A, Hong Q, Gondara L, Alam M, Cook D, Martin R Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(7):904-911.

PMID: 38773687 PMC: 11216858. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1587.


Epidemiology of HPV-associated cancers past, present and future: towards prevention and elimination.

Malagon T, Franco E, Tejada R, Vaccarella S Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024; 21(7):522-538.

PMID: 38760499 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00904-z.


Plumbagin as a preferential lead molecule to combat EGFR-driven matrix abundance and migration of cervical carcinoma cells.

Krishnamoorthy S, Sabanayagam R, Periyasamy L, Muruganantham B, Muthusami S Med Oncol. 2024; 41(4):89.

PMID: 38520625 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02332-6.

References
1.
Schiffman M, Herrero R, Hildesheim A, Sherman M, Bratti M, Wacholder S . HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: results from women in a high-risk province of Costa Rica. JAMA. 2000; 283(1):87-93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.1.87. View

2.
Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry K, Meijer C, Hoyer H, Ratnam S . Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2006; 119(5):1095-101. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21955. View

3.
Katki H, Kinney W, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Poitras N, Cheung L . Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(7):663-72. PMC: 3272857. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70145-0. View

4.
Gage J, Katki H, Schiffman M, Castle P, Fetterman B, Poitras N . The low risk of precancer after a screening result of human papillomavirus-negative/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance papanicolaou and implications for clinical management. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014; 122(11):842-50. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21463. View

5.
Cuzick J, Myers O, Hunt W, Robertson M, Joste N, Castle P . A population-based evaluation of cervical screening in the United States: 2008-2011. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 23(5):765-73. PMC: 4011954. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0973. View