» Articles » PMID: 29587783

Worldwide Use of the First Set of Physical Activity Country Cards: The Global Observatory for Physical Activity - GoPA!

Abstract

Background: The work of The Global Observatory for Physical Activity-GoPA! is the first global effort to compile standardized country-level surveillance, policy and research data for physical activity in order to better understand how countries and regions address promoting physical activity. GoPA! developed standardized country-specific physical activity profiles ("Country Cards") to summarize country-level data through 2013. The aim of this study was to assess use of the Country Cards, identify the factors associated with their use, and develop recommendations for supporting country-level physical activity promotion.

Methods: Cross sectional internet-based survey conducted between August-October 2016. Target study participants were national physical activity leaders and advocates in academia, government and practice from the GoPA! countries, and members of the International Society of Physical Activity and Health. A Country Card use composite score was created based on the diversity and frequency of use. Statistical analyses on the associations between the composite score and respondent characteristics, country characteristics, barriers and opinions were conducted (including descriptive analyses and a logistic regression with robust standard errors).

Results: One hundred forty three participants from 68 countries completed the survey. Use of the Country Cards was associated with being part of the GoPA! network, knowing about the Country Cards, and on the stage of country capacity for physical activity promotion. Country Card knowledge varied by country income group, region and the country specific context. More diverse and frequent use of the cards (highest tertile of the composite score for use) was associated with: 1. Being a country contact vs general participant (OR 18.32-95% CI 5.63-59.55, p = 0.002), and 2. Collaborating with a government representative working in NCDs on a monthly or more frequent contact vs less frequent contact (OR 3.39-95% CI 1.00-11.54, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: For the Country Cards to have a broader impact, GoPA! will need to widen its reach beyond the academic sector. With further refinement of the cards, and training in their implementation, they could be an important tool for advancing country capacity for contextually-relevant strategies, actions and timelines for PA promotion.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Patterns by Sex, Geographical Location, and Time of the Week in Mexican Adolescents.

Jauregui-Ulloa E, Ortiz-Brunel J, Gaytan-Gonzalez A, Soria-Rodriguez R, Perez-Maravilla J, Gonzalez-Villalobos M J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39584865 PMC: 11586980. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040212.


Chagas heart disease is associated with decreased physical activity levels: A cross-sectional analysis.

Ribeiro L, Goncalves T, Paravidino V, Costa H, Rodrigues Junior L, Mazzoli-Rocha F Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 52:101407.

PMID: 38617820 PMC: 11015123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101407.


The prevalence of overweight and obesity: a measurement-based analysis of 6-9-year-old school children from Montenegro.

Vasiljevic I, Petkovic J Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1194600.

PMID: 37234761 PMC: 10206028. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1194600.


A scoping review on the implementation of Global Observatory on Physical Activity recommendations for school children in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Ojedoyin O, Nadasan T, Govender P, Olagbegi O Health Promot Perspect. 2023; 12(4):336-344.

PMID: 36852201 PMC: 9958234. DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2022.43.


Status and Trends of Physical Activity Surveillance, Policy, and Research in 164 Countries: Findings From the Global Observatory for Physical Activity-GoPA! 2015 and 2020 Surveys.

Ramirez Varela A, Hallal P, Mejia Grueso J, Pedisic Z, Salvo D, Nguyen A J Phys Act Health. 2022; 20(2):112-128.

PMID: 36535269 PMC: 10115485. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0464.


References
1.
Cavill N, Foster C, Oja P, Martin B . An evidence-based approach to physical activity promotion and policy development in Europe: contrasting case studies. Promot Educ. 2006; 13(2):104-11. DOI: 10.1177/10253823060130020104. View

2.
Reis R, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert E, Goenka S, Brownson R . Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016; 388(10051):1337-48. PMC: 5193005. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0. View

3.
Shilton T . Advocacy for physical activity--from evidence to influence. Promot Educ. 2006; 13(2):118-26. DOI: 10.1177/10253823060130020106. View

4.
Brownson R, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride T . Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30(2):164-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004. View

5.
Hallal P, Andersen L, Bull F, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U . Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):247-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1. View