» Articles » PMID: 29582808

Simplifying "target" Intraocular Pressure for Different Stages of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2018 Mar 28
PMID 29582808
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lowering of intraocular pressure is currently the only therapeutic measure for Glaucoma management. Many longterm, randomized trials have shown the efficacy of lowering IOP, either by a percentage of baseline, or to a specified level. This has lead to the concept of 'Target" IOP, a range of IOP on therapy, that would stabilize the Glaucoma/prevent further visual field loss, without significantly affecting a patient's quality of life. A clinical staging of Glaucoma by optic nerve head evaluation and perimetric parameters, allows a patient's eye to be categorized as having - mild, moderate or severe Glaucomatous damage. An initial attempt should be made to achieve the following IOP range for both POAG or PACG after an iridotomy. In mild glaucoma the initial target IOP range could be kept as 15-17 mmHg, for moderate glaucoma 12-15 mmHg and in the severe stage of glaucomatous damage 10-12 mmHg. Factoring in baseline IOP, age, vascular perfusion parameters, and change on perimetry or imaging during follow up, this range may be reassessed over 6 months to a year. "Target" IOP requires further lowering when the patient continues to progress or develops a systemic disease such as a TIA. Conversely, in the event of a very elderly or sick patient with stable nerve and visual field over time, the target IOP could be raised and medications reduced. An appropriate use of medications/laser/surgery to achieve such a "Target" IOP range in POAG or PACG can maintain visual fields and quality of life, preventing Glaucoma blindness.

Citing Articles

Selective laser trabeculoplasty for the treatment of intraocular pressure elevation after viscocanalostomy with Ologen implant in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Gad A, Abdulhalim B, Gharib A, Mohammed A BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):60.

PMID: 39910397 PMC: 11800543. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-03888-1.


Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Jordan: Indications and Complications.

Alqudah A, Obaidi A, Al Zoubi M, Aleshawi A Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:3581-3590.

PMID: 39649982 PMC: 11625418. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S496586.


12-month Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of a Standalone Trabecular Bypass Device.

Huynh B, Clement C, Nguyen V, Ohagan S, Howes F, Macken P J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2024; 18(3):103-109.

PMID: 39575127 PMC: 11576339. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1447.


Multiple cytokine analysis of aqueous humor in uveitis with or without secondary glaucoma.

Xiao J, Zhao C, Cheng G, Song H, Zhang Y, Zhang M BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):451.

PMID: 39407182 PMC: 11476388. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03691-4.


Differences and Similarities Between Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma.

Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhang Y, Huang S, Zhong Y Eye Brain. 2024; 16:39-54.

PMID: 39309574 PMC: 11416111. DOI: 10.2147/EB.S472920.


References
1.
Vijaya L, Rashima A, Panday M, Choudhari N, Ve Ramesh S, Lokapavani V . Predictors for incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a South Indian population: the Chennai eye disease incidence study. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(7):1370-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.014. View

2.
Sihota R, Rao A, Srinivasan G, Gupta V, Sharma A, Dada T . Long-term scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and perimetry in different severities of primary open and chronic angle closure glaucoma eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017; 65(10):963-968. PMC: 5678332. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.216734. View

3.
Palmberg P . Evidence-based target pressures: how to choose and achieve them. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2004; 44(2):1-14. DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200404420-00003. View

4.
Lee J, Wong B, Yick D, Wong I, Yuen C, Lai J . Primary acute angle closure: long-term clinical outcomes over a 10-year period in the Chinese population. Int Ophthalmol. 2013; 34(2):165-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-013-9806-7. View

5.
Fujino Y, Asaoka R, Murata H, Miki A, Tanito M, Mizoue S . Evaluation of Glaucoma Progression in Large-Scale Clinical Data: The Japanese Archive of Multicentral Databases in Glaucoma (JAMDIG). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57(4):2012-20. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-19046. View