Super-resolution Musculoskeletal MRI Using Deep Learning
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To develop a super-resolution technique using convolutional neural networks for generating thin-slice knee MR images from thicker input slices, and compare this method with alternative through-plane interpolation methods.
Methods: We implemented a 3D convolutional neural network entitled DeepResolve to learn residual-based transformations between high-resolution thin-slice images and lower-resolution thick-slice images at the same center locations. DeepResolve was trained using 124 double echo in steady-state (DESS) data sets with 0.7-mm slice thickness and tested on 17 patients. Ground-truth images were compared with DeepResolve, clinically used tricubic interpolation, and Fourier interpolation methods, along with state-of-the-art single-image sparse-coding super-resolution. Comparisons were performed using structural similarity, peak SNR, and RMS error image quality metrics for a multitude of thin-slice downsampling factors. Two musculoskeletal radiologists ranked the 3 data sets and reviewed the diagnostic quality of the DeepResolve, tricubic interpolation, and ground-truth images for sharpness, contrast, artifacts, SNR, and overall diagnostic quality. Mann-Whitney U tests evaluated differences among the quantitative image metrics, reader scores, and rankings. Cohen's Kappa (κ) evaluated interreader reliability.
Results: DeepResolve had significantly better structural similarity, peak SNR, and RMS error than tricubic interpolation, Fourier interpolation, and sparse-coding super-resolution for all downsampling factors (p < .05, except 4 × and 8 × sparse-coding super-resolution downsampling factors). In the reader study, DeepResolve significantly outperformed (p < .01) tricubic interpolation in all image quality categories and overall image ranking. Both readers had substantial scoring agreement (κ = 0.73).
Conclusion: DeepResolve was capable of resolving high-resolution thin-slice knee MRI from lower-resolution thicker slices, achieving superior quantitative and qualitative diagnostic performance to both conventionally used and state-of-the-art methods.
Fujima N, Shimizu Y, Ikebe Y, Kameda H, Harada T, Tsushima N Jpn J Radiol. 2025; .
PMID: 40038217 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-025-01756-y.
Super-resolution mapping of anisotropic tissue structure with diffusion MRI and deep learning.
Ordinola A, Abramian D, Herberthson M, Eklund A, Ozarslan E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6580.
PMID: 39994322 PMC: 11850900. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90972-7.
Li L, He Q, Wei S, Wang H, Wang Z, Yang W MAGMA. 2025; .
PMID: 39964601 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-025-01234-6.
Wilpert C, Schneider H, Rau A, Russe M, Oerther B, Strecker R Korean J Radiol. 2025; 26(1):29-42.
PMID: 39780629 PMC: 11717867. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1303.
Zhang S, Zhong M, Shenliu H, Wang N, Hu S, Lu X AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025; 46(1):41-48.
PMID: 39779291 PMC: 11735436. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8482.