» Articles » PMID: 18786841

The Osteoarthritis Initiative: Report on the Design Rationale for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for the Knee

Overview
Date 2008 Sep 13
PMID 18786841
Citations 342
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To report on the process and criteria for selecting acquisition protocols to include in the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study protocol for the knee.

Methods: Candidate knee MR acquisition protocols identified from the literature were first optimized at 3Tesla (T). Twelve knees from 10 subjects were scanned one time with each of 16 acquisitions considered most likely to achieve the study goals and having the best optimization results. The resultant images and multi-planar reformats were evaluated for artifacts and structural discrimination of articular cartilage at the cartilage-fluid, cartilage-fat, cartilage-capsule, cartilage-meniscus and cartilage-cartilage interfaces.

Results: The five acquisitions comprising the final OAI MRI protocol were assembled based on the study goals for the imaging protocol, the image evaluation results and the need to image both knees within a 75 min time slot, including positioning. For quantitative cartilage morphometry, fat-suppressed, 3D dual-echo in steady state (DESS) acquisitions appear to provide the best universal cartilage discrimination.

Conclusions: The OAI knee MRI protocol provides imaging data on multiple articular structures and features relevant to knee OA that will support a broad range of existing and anticipated measurement methods while balancing requirements for high image quality and consistency against the practical considerations of a large multi-center cohort study. Strengths of the final knee MRI protocol include cartilage quantification capabilities in three planes due to multi-planar reconstruction of a thin slice, high spatial resolution 3D DESS acquisition and the multiple, non-fat-suppressed image contrasts measured during the T2 relaxation time mapping acquisition.

Citing Articles

Weaker subchondral bone and thinner articular cartilage of the knee are associated with elevated baseline fracture risk independently of osteoarthritis risk factors.

Wong A, Pokhoy A, Naraghi A, Mohankumar R Arch Osteoporos. 2025; 20(1):36.

PMID: 40055244 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-025-01517-4.


MRI-based analysis of thigh intramuscular fat and its associations with age, sex, and BMI using data from the osteoarthritis initiative data.

Joseph G, Akkaya Z, Sims W, McCulloch C, Nevitt M, Lynch J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6188.

PMID: 39979320 PMC: 11842767. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75005-z.


The Condition of the Meniscus and Cartilage of the Injured Knee on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Prognostic Factor Affecting Postoperative Outcomes Following Knee Cartilage Restoration Surgery.

Sato D, Manatrakul R, Ngarmsrikam C, Feeley B, Ma C, Link T Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 6(6):100973.

PMID: 39776500 PMC: 11701935. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100973.


Influence of the Initial Guess on the Estimation of Knee Ligament Parameters via Optimization Procedures.

Theodorakos I, Andersen M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39768000 PMC: 11727144. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121183.


Fully-automated segmentation of muscle and inter-/intra-muscular fat from magnetic resonance images of calves and thighs: an open-source workflow in Python.

Tam K, Liu S, Costa S, Szabo E, Reitsma S, Gillick H Skelet Muscle. 2024; 14(1):37.

PMID: 39731189 PMC: 11674188. DOI: 10.1186/s13395-024-00365-z.


References
1.
Borthakur A, Mellon E, Niyogi S, Witschey W, Kneeland J, Reddy R . Sodium and T1rho MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage. NMR Biomed. 2006; 19(7):781-821. PMC: 2896046. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1102. View

2.
Gold G, Burstein D, Dardzinski B, Lang P, Boada F, Mosher T . MRI of articular cartilage in OA: novel pulse sequences and compositional/functional markers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006; 14 Suppl A:A76-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.010. View

3.
Dardzinski B, Mosher T, Li S, Van Slyke M, Smith M . Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology. 1997; 205(2):546-50. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356643. View

4.
Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Kiefer B, Jackson R, Yu J . Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 65(4):433-41. PMC: 1798091. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.039370. View

5.
Duryea J, Neumann G, Brem M, Koh W, Noorbakhsh F, Jackson R . Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006; 15(5):487-92. PMC: 4175990. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.002. View