» Articles » PMID: 29580829

Sweat Test for Cystic Fibrosis: Wearable Sweat Sensor Vs. Standard Laboratory Test

Overview
Journal J Cyst Fibros
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2018 Mar 28
PMID 29580829
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sweat chloride testing for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) involves sweat induction, collection and handling, and measurement in an analytical lab. We have developed a wearable sensor with an integrated salt bridge for real-time measurement of sweat chloride concentration. Here, in a proof-of-concept study, we compare the performance of the sensor to current clinical practice in CF patients and healthy subjects.

Method: Sweat was induced on both forearms of 10 individuals with CF and 10 healthy subjects using pilocarpine iontophoresis. A Macroduct sweat collection device was attached to one arm and sweat was collected for 30 min and then sent for laboratory analysis. A sensor was attached to the other arm and the chloride ion concentration monitored in real time for 30 min using a Bluetooth transceiver and smart phone app.

Results: Stable sweat chloride measurements were obtained within 15 min following sweat induction using the wearable sensor. We define the detection time as the time at which the standard deviation of the real-time chloride ion concentration remained below 2 mEq/L for 5 min. The sweat volume for sensor measurements at the detection time was 13.1 ± 11.4 μL (SD), in many cases lower than the minimum sweat volume of 15 μL for conventional testing. The mean difference between sweat chloride concentrations measured by the sensor and the conventional laboratory practice was 6.2 ± 9.5 mEq/L (SD), close to the arm-to-arm variation of about 3 mEq/L. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0.97 highlighting the excellent agreement between the two methods.

Conclusion: A wearable sensor can be used to make real-time measurements of sweat chloride within 15 min following sweat induction, requiring a small sweat volume, and with excellent agreement to standard methods.

Citing Articles

Diagnosing Cystic Fibrosis in the 21st Century-A Complex and Challenging Task.

Anton-Paduraru D, Azoicai A, Trofin F, Mindru D, Murgu A, Bocec A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38611676 PMC: 11012009. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14070763.


Wearable non-invasive glucose sensors based on metallic nanomaterials.

Zhang S, Zhao W, Zeng J, He Z, Wang X, Zhu Z Mater Today Bio. 2023; 20:100638.

PMID: 37128286 PMC: 10148187. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100638.


Skin-Interfaced Wearable Sweat Sensors for Precision Medicine.

Min J, Tu J, Xu C, Lukas H, Shin S, Yang Y Chem Rev. 2023; 123(8):5049-5138.

PMID: 36971504 PMC: 10406569. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00823.


Graphene and Its Derivatives: Synthesis and Application in the Electrochemical Detection of Analytes in Sweat.

Singh A, Ahmed A, Sharma A, Arya S Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36291046 PMC: 9599499. DOI: 10.3390/bios12100910.


A Comprehensive Review of the Recent Developments in Wearable Sweat-Sensing Devices.

Ibrahim N, Sabani N, Johari S, Abd Manaf A, Wahab A, Zakaria Z Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19).

PMID: 36236769 PMC: 9573257. DOI: 10.3390/s22197670.