» Articles » PMID: 2957955

Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Renal Failure

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1987 Aug 1
PMID 2957955
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

By using a highly specific chromatographic technique, the effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of the six main components of teicoplanin, taken individually or as a whole, was assessed for over 120 h after administration of a 3-mg/kg intravenous dose to healthy volunteers (group 1, n = 6) and to noninfected patients with moderate (group 2, n = 6) or severe (group 3, n = 7) renal failure. In subjects with normal renal function, total teicoplanin was mainly excreted in urine and its concentrations in plasma could be adequately fitted to a three-compartment model. Renal failure did not affect the model or the distribution of teicoplanin but strongly decreased its renal clearance (9.3, 3.2, and 0.6 ml/h per kg, respectively, for the three groups of subjects), in close relationship with the creatinine clearance (r = 0.973, n = 18, P less than 0.001). The cumulative urinary excretion of unchanged total teicoplanin was decreased (50, 21, and 5% of the given dose for groups 1 to 3) and the terminal half-life was enhanced (62, 96, and 111 h for groups 1 to 3) by renal impairment. The relative behavior of the six major components was only slightly affected by renal failure. Consequently, the dosage regimen adjustment could be based on the total teicoplanin concentration, and simulations with the mean estimated pharmacokinetic parameters suggest that the 6-mg/kg daily dose, known to be effective in patients with normal renal function, could be given every 2 and 3 days in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency, respectively.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Teicoplanin: A Systematic Review.

Mouton J, De Clercq A, De Paepe P, Petrovic M, Desmet T, Bruggemann R Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025; .

PMID: 40064832 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-025-01483-7.


Necessity for higher teicoplanin doses in older adults: a multicenter prospective observational study in China.

Liu T, Wu J, Na P, Wu X, Yuan Y, Wang C BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):487.

PMID: 38831261 PMC: 11149339. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05091-1.


Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of teicoplanin in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Chen C, Xie M, Gong J, Yu N, Wei R, Lei L Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1132367.

PMID: 37188268 PMC: 10175687. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1132367.


Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Hanai Y, Takahashi Y, Niwa T, Mayumi T, Hamada Y, Kimura T J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022; 77(4):869-879.

PMID: 35022752 PMC: 8969460. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab499.


Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in hemodialysis patients.

Beckers B, Brodersen H, Stolpmann R, Jansen G, Larbig D Infection. 1993; 21(1):71-4.

PMID: 8449588 DOI: 10.1007/BF01739321.


References
1.
Calain P, Krause K, Vaudaux P, Auckenthaler R, Lew D, Waldvogel F . Early termination of a prospective, randomized trial comparing teicoplanin and flucloxacillin for treating severe staphylococcal infections. J Infect Dis. 1987; 155(2):187-91. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/155.2.187. View

2.
Traina G, Gentile M, Fellin G, Rosina R, Cavenaghi L, BUNIVA G . Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986; 31(4):501-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00613532. View

3.
Reed Jr W, Sabatini S . The use of drugs in renal failure. Semin Nephrol. 1986; 6(3):259-95. View

4.
DArgenio D, Schumitzky A . A program package for simulation and parameter estimation in pharmacokinetic systems. Comput Programs Biomed. 1979; 9(2):115-34. DOI: 10.1016/0010-468x(79)90025-4. View

5.
Matzke G, McGory R, Halstenson C, Keane W . Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 25(4):433-7. PMC: 185546. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.25.4.433. View