» Articles » PMID: 29573274

Listen to the Public and Fulfil Their Information Interests - Translating Vaccine Communication Research Findings into Guidance for Regulators

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2018 Mar 25
PMID 29573274
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regulatory authorities have a crucial role in communicating about the vaccines they license. In terms of content and timing, their communication to the public is usually driven by data on quality, safety and efficacy. However, concerns over safety and vaccine hesitancy have emerged in some communities in various countries, and this demands a new approach to communication, starting with listening to the public debate. Reviewing communication research findings, coming in particular from the cognitive, decision-making and media sciences, constitutes one mechanism of listening and has led the European Union (EU) regulatory network to developing guidance about which common concerns and information needs of the public to address through proactive and prepared communication. The guidance has been welcomed by EU and international fora. The current article summarizes the recommendations and shares the underlying research findings, as well as a proof of concept that communication research can be valuable for regulators. It is critical that regulators integrate the communication process with product risk assessment in the framework of pharmacovigilance, to ensure that public concerns are addressed in the assessments and that information about evidence and uncertainty relating to safety is provided to the public and vaccination policy makers in a specific, clear and accurate manner. Additionally, information from regulatory authorities should support healthcare professionals in their communication with patients. Meeting the information interests of the public is the principal prerequisite for informed decisions as well as safe and effective use of vaccines and medicines overall. This is also fundamental for trust in the authorities' commitment to patient and population health.

Citing Articles

Prospective Attitudes towards Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccination: Validation of a Survey Instrument among Young Females in Jordan Pending Vaccine Authorization.

Kherfan T, Sallam M Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37631954 PMC: 10459998. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081386.


Acceptance of Booster COVID-19 Vaccine and Its Association with Components of Vaccination Readiness in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Survey for Starting Booster Dose in Japan.

Tokiya M, Hara M, Matsumoto A, Ashenagar M, Nakano T, Hirota Y Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35891266 PMC: 9323594. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071102.


Pilot Study of Evaluating Attitudes toward Childhood Immunization among Healthcare Workers in Japan.

Saitoh A, Shobugawa Y, Sato I, Yonekura Y, Kawabata A, Saitoh A Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35891220 PMC: 9318564. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071055.


Association of Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy in Three Phases of COVID-19 Vaccine Approval and Introduction in Japan.

Tokiya M, Hara M, Matsumoto A, Ashenagar M, Nakano T, Hirota Y Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35335055 PMC: 8954745. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10030423.


A public health timeline to prepare for COVID-19 vaccines in Canada.

MacDonald N, Comeau J, Dube E, Bucci L, Graham J Can J Public Health. 2020; 111(6):945-952.

PMID: 33151510 PMC: 7643523. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00423-1.


References
1.
Miton H, Mercier H . Cognitive Obstacles to Pro-Vaccination Beliefs. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015; 19(11):633-636. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.007. View

2.
Sherris J, Friedman A, Wittet S, Davies P, Steben M, Saraiya M . Chapter 25: Education, training, and communication for HPV vaccines. Vaccine. 2006; 24 Suppl 3:S3/210-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.124. View

3.
Campbell V, Gilyard J, Sinclair L, Sternberg T, Kailes J . Preparing for and responding to pandemic influenza: implications for people with disabilities. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99 Suppl 2:S294-300. PMC: 4504380. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162677. View

4.
Kennedy A, Groom H, Evans V, Fasano N . A qualitative analysis of immunization programs with sustained high coverage, 2000-2005. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009; 16(1):E9-17. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c7e053. View

5.
McMurray R, Cheater F, Weighall A, Nelson C, Schweiger M, Mukherjee S . Managing controversy through consultation: a qualitative study of communication and trust around MMR vaccination decisions. Br J Gen Pract. 2004; 54(504):520-5. PMC: 1324804. View