» Articles » PMID: 29564236

Food Safety in Food Services in Lombardy: Proposal for an Inspection-scoring Model

Overview
Journal Ital J Food Saf
Publisher PagePress
Date 2018 Mar 23
PMID 29564236
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to elaborate a checklist with an inspection scoring system at national level in order to assess compliance with sanitary hygiene requirements of food services. The inspection scoring system was elaborated taking into account the guidelines drawn up by NYC Department of Food Safety and Mental Hygiene. Moreover the checklist was used simultaneously with the standard inspection protocol adopted by ( - Ss. I.A.N) and defined by D.G.R 6 March 2017 - n. X/6299 Lombardy Region. Ss. I.A.N protocol consists of a qualitative response according to which we have generated a new protocol with three different grading: A, B and C. The designed checklist was divided into 17 sections. Each section corresponds to prerequisites to be verified during the inspection. Every section includes the type of conformity to check and the type of violation: critical or general. Moreover, the failure to respect the expected compliance generates 4 severity levels that correspond to score classes. A total of 7 food services were checked with the two different inspection methods. The checklist results generated a food safety score for each food service that ranged from 0.0 (no flaws observed) to 187.2, and generates three grading class: A (0.0-28.0); B (29.0-70.0) and C (>71.00). The results from the Ss. I. A. N grading method and the checklist show positive correlation (=0.94, P>0.01) suggesting that the methods are comparable. Moreover, our scoring checklist is an easy and unique method compared to standard and allows also managers to perform effective surveillance programs in food service.

References
1.
da Cunha D, Saccol A, Tondo E, de Oliveira A, Ginani V, Araujo C . Inspection Score and Grading System for Food Services in Brazil: The Results of a Food Safety Strategy to Reduce the Risk of Foodborne Diseases during the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:614. PMC: 4847479. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00614. View

2.
Fielding J, Aguirre A, Palaiologos E . Effectiveness of altered incentives in a food safety inspection program. Prev Med. 2001; 32(3):239-44. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0796. View

3.
Kufel J, Resnick B, Fox M, McGready J, Yager J, Burke T . The impact of local environmental health capacity on foodborne illness morbidity in Maryland. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(8):1495-500. PMC: 3134516. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300137. View

4.
Buchholz U, Run G, Kool J, Fielding J, Mascola L . A risk-based restaurant inspection system in Los Angeles County. J Food Prot. 2002; 65(2):367-72. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.2.367. View

5.
Razzini K, Balzaretti C . . Ital J Food Saf. 2015; 4(3):4514. PMC: 5076632. DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2015.4514. View