» Articles » PMID: 21750282

The Impact of Local Environmental Health Capacity on Foodborne Illness Morbidity in Maryland

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Jul 14
PMID 21750282
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the relationship between local food protection capacity and service provision in Maryland's 24 local food protection programs (FPPs) and incidence of foodborne illness at the county level.

Methods: We conducted regression analyses to determine the relationship between foodborne illness and local FPP characteristics. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's FoodNet and Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene outbreak data set, along with data on Maryland's local FPP capacity (workforce size and experience levels, budget) and service provision (food service facility inspections, public notification programs).

Results: Counties with higher capacity, such as larger workforce, higher budget, and greater employee experience, had fewer foodborne illnesses. Counties with better performance and county-level regulations, such as high food service facility inspection rates and requiring certified food manager programs, respectively, had lower rates of illness.

Conclusions: Counties with strong local food protection capacity and services can protect the public from foodborne illness. Research on public health services can enhance our understanding of the food protection infrastructure, and the effectiveness of food protection programs in preventing foodborne illness.

Citing Articles

Operational Antecedents Associated with Outbreaks in Retail Food Establishments, United States, 2015-2018.

Wittry B, Holst M, Anderberg J, Hedeen N Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2022; 19(3):209-216.

PMID: 35006004 PMC: 10025997. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2021.0068.


Environmental Health Program Performance and its Relationship with Environment-Related Disease in Florida.

Gerding J, DeLellis N, Neri A, Dignam T Fla Public Health Rev. 2018; 15:1-12.

PMID: 29732462 PMC: 5928796.


Food safety in food services in Lombardy: proposal for an inspection-scoring model.

Balzaretti C, Razzini K, Ziviani S, Ratti S, Milicevic V, Chiesa L Ital J Food Saf. 2018; 6(4):6915.

PMID: 29564236 PMC: 5850054. DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2017.6915.


Inspection Score and Grading System for Food Services in Brazil: The Results of a Food Safety Strategy to Reduce the Risk of Foodborne Diseases during the 2014 FIFA World Cup.

da Cunha D, Saccol A, Tondo E, de Oliveira A, Ginani V, Araujo C Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:614.

PMID: 27199943 PMC: 4847479. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00614.


Local health department food safety and sanitation expenditures and reductions in enteric disease, 2000-2010.

Bekemeier B, Pui-Yan Yip M, Dunbar M, Whitman G, Kwan-Gett T Am J Public Health. 2015; 105 Suppl 2:S345-52.

PMID: 25689186 PMC: 4355703. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302555.


References
1.
Hedberg C, Smith S, Kirkland E, Radke V, Jones T, Selman C . Systematic environmental evaluations to identify food safety differences between outbreak and nonoutbreak restaurants. J Food Prot. 2006; 69(11):2697-702. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2697. View

2.
Scallan E, Griffin P, Angulo F, Tauxe R, Hoekstra R . Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--unspecified agents. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17(1):16-22. PMC: 3204615. DOI: 10.3201/eid1701.091101p2. View

3.
Greig J, Todd E, Bartleson C, Michaels B . Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 1. Description of the problem, methods, and agents involved. J Food Prot. 2007; 70(7):1752-61. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.7.1752. View

4.
Shapiro R, Ackers M, Lance S, Rabbani M, Schaefer L, DAUGHERTY J . Salmonella Thompson associated with improper handling of roast beef at a restaurant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. J Food Prot. 1999; 62(2):118-22. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.2.118. View

5.
Fielding J, Aguirre A, Palaiologos E . Effectiveness of altered incentives in a food safety inspection program. Prev Med. 2001; 32(3):239-44. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0796. View