» Articles » PMID: 29563367

Comparison of Accelerometer-measured Sedentary Behavior, and Light- and Moderate-to-vigorous-intensity Physical Activity in White- and Blue-collar Workers in a Japanese Manufacturing Plant

Overview
Journal J Occup Health
Date 2018 Mar 23
PMID 29563367
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The times spent in sedentary behavior (SB) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) are independently associated with health outcomes; however, objective data on physical activity levels including SB among different occupations is limited. We compared accelerometer-measured times spent in SB, light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and MVPA, and the patterns associated with prolonged bouts of SB between white- and blue-collar workers.

Methods: The study population consisted of 102 full-time plant workers (54 white-collar and 48 blue-collar) who wore a triaxial accelerometer during waking hours for 5 working days. Accelerometer-measured activity levels were categorized as SB (≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs)), LPA (1.6-2.9 METs), and MVPA (≥3.0 METs). A sedentary bout was defined as consecutive minutes during which the accelerometer registered less than ≤1.5 METs. Accelerometer variables were compared between white- and blue-collar workers through analysis of covariance.

Results: During working hours, white-collar workers spent significantly more time in SB and less time in LPA than blue-collar workers (SB: 6.4 h vs. 4.8 h, 73% vs. 55% of total work time; LPA: 1.9 h vs. 3.5 h, 22% vs. 40% of total work time, p<.001), whereas the MVPA time was similar between the groups. White-collar workers spent significantly more SB time in prolonged sedentary bouts (≥30 min) compared to blue-collar workers. During leisure time, the SB, LPA, and MVPA times were similar between the groups.

Conclusions: White-collar workers have significantly longer SB times than blue-collar workers during work hours, and do not compensate for their excess SB during work by reducing SB during leisure time.

Citing Articles

Automotive workers: the role of coordinative and conditional abilities as effectiveness wellness indicator.

Rodio A, Di Libero T, Biffi A, Fernando F, Fattorini L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1447358.

PMID: 39469214 PMC: 11513271. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1447358.


mHealth Intervention to Promote Physical Activity Among Employees Using a Deep Learning Model for Passive Monitoring of Depression and Anxiety: Single-Arm Feasibility Trial.

Watanabe K, Okusa S, Sato M, Miura H, Morimoto M, Tsutsumi A JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e51334.

PMID: 37976094 PMC: 10692887. DOI: 10.2196/51334.


Association between Physical Activity Guidelines and Sedentary Time with Workers' Health-Related Quality of Life in a Spanish Multinational Company.

Gomez-Redondo P, Marin V, Leal-Martin J, Ruiz-Moreno C, Giraldez-Costas V, Urdiola P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(11).

PMID: 35682176 PMC: 9180907. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116592.


The Impact of Lifetime Work and Non-work Physical Activity on Physical Fitness Among White - and Blue - Collar Retirees: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Trzmiel T, Pieczynska A, Zasadzka E, Pawlaczyk M Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 8:745929.

PMID: 34977059 PMC: 8714832. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.745929.


Respiratory Function and Muscle Strength Vs. Past Work Type: a Cross-Sectional Study Among Retirees.

Trzmiel T, Pieczynska A, Zasadzka E, Pawlaczyk M Can Geriatr J. 2021; 24(4):297-303.

PMID: 34912483 PMC: 8629504. DOI: 10.5770/cgj.24.501.


References
1.
Thorp A, Kingwell B, Owen N, Dunstan D . Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers. Occup Environ Med. 2014; 71(11):765-71. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102348. View

2.
Tudor-Locke C, Leonardi C, Johnson W, Katzmarzyk P . Time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors on the working day: the American time use survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2011; 53(12):1382-7. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31823c1402. View

3.
Oshima Y, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S, Ohkawara K, Hikihara Y, Ishikawa-Takata K . Classifying household and locomotive activities using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2010; 31(3):370-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.005. View

4.
Clemes S, OConnell S, Edwardson C . Office workers' objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours. J Occup Environ Med. 2014; 56(3):298-303. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000101. View

5.
Thorp A, Healy G, Winkler E, Clark B, Gardiner P, Owen N . Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:128. PMC: 3546308. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-128. View