» Articles » PMID: 29558363

Signal Intensity Analysis and Optimization for in Vivo Imaging of Cherenkov and Excited Luminescence

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2018 Mar 21
PMID 29558363
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in vivo Cherenkov optical emissions can be used as a dosimetry tool or to excite luminescence, termed Cherenkov-excited luminescence (CEL) with microsecond-level time-gated cameras. The goal of this work was to develop a complete theoretical foundation for the detectable signal strength, in order to provide guidance on optimization of the limits of detection and how to optimize near real time imaging. The key parameters affecting photon production, propagation and detection were considered and experimental validation with both tissue phantoms and a murine model are shown. Both the theoretical analysis and experimental data indicate that the detection level is near a single photon-per-pixel for the detection geometry and frame rates commonly used, with the strongest factor being the signal decrease with the square of distance from tissue to camera. Experimental data demonstrates how the SNR improves with increasing integration time, but only up to the point where the dominance of camera read noise is overcome by stray photon noise that cannot be suppressed. For the current camera in a fixed geometry, the signal to background ratio limits the detection of light signals, and the observed in vivo Cherenkov emission is on the order of 100×  stronger than CEL signals. As a result, imaging signals from depths  <15 mm is reasonable for Cherenkov light, and depths  <3 mm is reasonable for CEL imaging. The current investigation modeled Cherenkov and CEL imaging of two oxygen sensing phosphorescent compounds, but the modularity of the code allows for easy comparison of different agents or alternative cameras, geometries or tissues.

Citing Articles

Photon-limited Cherenkov imaging of radiation therapy dose.

Jia M, Sun B, Wang Y, Gao F, Yuan Z, Pogue B Opt Lett. 2023; 48(7):1918-1921.

PMID: 37221799 PMC: 10914388. DOI: 10.1364/OL.485668.


Comparison of surface dose during whole breast radiation therapy on Halcyon and TrueBeam using Cherenkov imaging.

Alexander D, Certa O, Haertter A, Li T, Taunk N, Zhu T Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023; 12371.

PMID: 37101538 PMC: 10128868. DOI: 10.1117/12.2652588.


Prospective testing of clinical Cerenkov luminescence imaging against standard-of-care nuclear imaging for tumour location.

Pratt E, Skubal M, Larney B, Causa-Andrieu P, Das S, Sawan P Nat Biomed Eng. 2022; 6(5):559-568.

PMID: 35411113 PMC: 9149092. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-022-00876-4.


Theoretical lateral and axial sensitivity limits and choices of molecular reporters for Cherenkov-excited luminescence in tissue during x-ray beam scanning.

LaRochelle E, Pogue B J Biomed Opt. 2020; 25(11).

PMID: 33185051 PMC: 7658603. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.11.116004.


Detective quantum efficiency of intensified CMOS cameras for Cherenkov imaging in radiotherapy.

Alexander D, Bruza P, Farwell J, Krishnaswamy V, Zhang R, Gladstone D Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65(22):225013.

PMID: 33179612 PMC: 10416224. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb0c5.


References
1.
Esipova T, Karagodov A, Miller J, Wilson D, Busch T, Vinogradov S . Two new "protected" oxyphors for biological oximetry: properties and application in tumor imaging. Anal Chem. 2011; 83(22):8756-65. PMC: 3617485. DOI: 10.1021/ac2022234. View

2.
Axelsson J, Glaser A, Gladstone D, Pogue B . Quantitative Cherenkov emission spectroscopy for tissue oxygenation assessment. Opt Express. 2012; 20(5):5133-42. PMC: 3500100. DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.005133. View

3.
Glaser A, Zhang R, Andreozzi J, Gladstone D, Pogue B . Cherenkov radiation fluence estimates in tissue for molecular imaging and therapy applications. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(17):6701-18. PMC: 5145313. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/17/6701. View

4.
Glaser A, Davis S, McClatchy D, Zhang R, Pogue B, Gladstone D . Projection imaging of photon beams by the Čerenkov effect. Med Phys. 2013; 40(1):012101. PMC: 3537759. DOI: 10.1118/1.4770286. View

5.
Andreozzi J, Zhang R, Glaser A, Jarvis L, Pogue B, Gladstone D . Camera selection for real-time in vivo radiation treatment verification systems using Cherenkov imaging. Med Phys. 2015; 42(2):994-1004. PMC: 4312350. DOI: 10.1118/1.4906249. View