» Articles » PMID: 29543050

The Changing Practice of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Mar 16
PMID 29543050
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The number of TURPs performed has declined significantly over the last three decades owing to pharmaceutical therapy. TURP data from a single institution for the years 1990, 2000 and 2010 were compared to assess the difference in performance. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all patients who underwent TURP between January and December 2010. These findings were compared with historical data for the years 1990 and 2000: 100 sets of case notes were selected randomly from each of these years. Results The number of TURPs performed fell from 326 in 1990 to 113 in 2010. The mean age of patients increased from 70.6 years to 74.0 years. There was also a significant increase in the mean ASA grade from 1.9 to 2.3. The most common indication for TURP shifted from LUTS to acute urinary retention. No significant change in operating time was observed. The mean resection weight remained constant (22.95g in 1990, 22.55g in 2000, 20.76g in 2010). A reduction in transfusion rates was observed but there were higher rates of secondary haematuria and bladder neck stenosis. There was an increase from 2% to 11.5% of patients with long-term failure to void following TURP. Conclusions The number of TURPs performed continues to decline, which could lead to potential training issues. Urinary retention is still by far the most common indication. However, there has been a significant rise in the percentage of men presenting for TURP with high pressure chronic retention. The number of patients with bladder dysfunction who either have persistent storage LUTS or eventually require long-term catheterisation or intermittent self-catheterisation has increased markedly, which raises the question of what the long-term real life impact of medical therapy is on men with LUTS secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia who eventually require surgery.

Citing Articles

A flexible cystoscopy device prototype for mechanical tissue ablation based on micro-scale hydrodynamic cavitation: Ex vivo and in vivo studies.

Kestek E, Akar U, Seyedmirzaei Sarraf S, Kanbur O, Gorkem Kirabali U, Eda Sutova H Ultrason Sonochem. 2025; 114:107223.

PMID: 39999595 PMC: 11903950. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107223.


Development of a clinical decision support tool for Primary care Management of lower Urinary tract Symptoms in men: the PriMUS study.

Edwards A, Agarwal R, Bates J, Bray A, Milosevic S, Thomas-Jones E Health Technol Assess. 2025; 29(1):1-140.

PMID: 39895567 PMC: 11874884. DOI: 10.3310/RGTW5711.


Comparing Urethral Stricture Rates Following Bipolar and Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Retrospective Study.

Akpala A, Warda A, Batson-Patel S, Bhattacharyya S, Damola A, Farag A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73548.

PMID: 39669803 PMC: 11637457. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73548.


Comparative assessment of attitudes and expectations: Iranian patients versus urologists in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Hosseini J, Alinejad Khorram A, Abedi A, Hosseini M, Fayaz M BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):219.

PMID: 39379872 PMC: 11459691. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01612-7.


Application of root cause analysis and TEAMSTEPPS post intravesical gas explosion during transurethral resection of the prostate: a rare case report.

Chen I, Fong C, Chang H, Ni Y, Chiu K, Lee K BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):139.

PMID: 38965501 PMC: 11225426. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01520-w.


References
1.
Madersbacher S, Marberger M . Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified?. BJU Int. 1999; 83(3):227-37. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00908.x. View

2.
Izard J, Nickel J . Impact of medical therapy on transurethral resection of the prostate: two decades of change. BJU Int. 2010; 108(1):89-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09737.x. View

3.
Forster J, Browning A, Paul A, Biyani C . Surgical simulators in urological training--views of UK Training Programme Directors. BJU Int. 2012; 110(6):776-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10865.x. View

4.
Kaplan S . Transurethral resection of the prostate--is our gold standard still a precious commodity?. J Urol. 2008; 180(1):15-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.065. View

5.
Horninger W, Unterlechner H, Strasser H, Bartsch G . Transurethral prostatectomy: mortality and morbidity. Prostate. 1996; 28(3):195-200. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199603)28:3<195::AID-PROS6>3.0.CO;2-E. View