» Articles » PMID: 34733883

The Design and Rationale of a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Transperineal Percutaneous Laser Ablation With Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Nov 4
PMID 34733883
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in elderly men. However, ~15% of patients who had undergone TURP had intraoperative and postoperative complications, such as bleeding, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture. Transperineal percutaneous laser ablation (TPLA) is a method that places the optical fibre directly into the prostate with the guidance of ultrasound imaging, and the percutaneous transperineal approach is performed distal to the urethra and rectum to protect these structures and reduce urethral or postoperative infection. Several studies on TPLA for BPH treatment have been reported recently; however, high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate its efficacy, safety, and long-term follow up remain absent. This study is a multicentre, open-label RCT to assess the efficacy and safety of TPLA vs. TURP to treat BPH. We hypothesise that the TPLA has non-inferior efficacy to TURP in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 months changing from the baseline and lower incidence of post-surgery complications. One hundred and fourteen patients with BPH will be recruited at 19 sites and randomly assigned at 1:1 to TPLA or TURP groups. The patients will be followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the procedure. The study will be the first multicentre clinical trial including 16 participating centres in China, Italy, Switzerland, and Poland with relatively large sample size 114. By comprehensively compare the safety and efficacy of TPLA with TURP in patients with BPH, especially concerning the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and complication incidence, the study will help to illustrate the clinical value of TPLA and provide a beneficial alternative treatment for BPH patients. The study has been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn), identifier [ChiCTR1900022739].

Citing Articles

Transperineal laser ablation as treatment for benign prostatic obstruction: Safety, feasibility and functional outcomes-A pilot study.

van Kollenburg R, van Riel L, Bloemen P, de Reijke T, Beerlage H, de Bruin D BJUI Compass. 2024; 5(1):52-59.

PMID: 38179027 PMC: 10764162. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.278.


Transperineal Laser Ablation for Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Pilot Studies.

Tafuri A, Panunzio A, De Carlo F, Luperto E, Di Cosmo F, Cavaliere A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 36902647 PMC: 10003190. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12051860.


Ultrasound-guided SoracteLite™ transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): a prospective single-center experience.

Lagana A, Di Lascio G, Di Blasi A, Licari L, Tufano A, Flammia R World J Urol. 2023; 41(4):1157-1162.

PMID: 36853444 PMC: 10160153. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04322-1.


Transperineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate (TPLA) for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction.

Sessa F, Polverino P, Siena G, Bisegna C, Lo Re M, Spatafora P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36769454 PMC: 9918261. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030793.


Analysis of Risk Factors and Nursing Strategies for Postoperative Hemorrhage of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Jin S, Liu Z, Liu Y, Wu J, Yu Q Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:4205015.

PMID: 35646136 PMC: 9135509. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4205015.

References
1.
Woo M, Ha Y, Lee J, Kim B, Kim H, Kim T . Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Holmium Laser Enucleation and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity. Int Neurourol J. 2017; 21(1):46-52. PMC: 5380818. DOI: 10.5213/inj.1732640.320. View

2.
Pandis N, Chung B, Scherer R, Elbourne D, Altman D . CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials. BMJ. 2017; 357:j2835. PMC: 5492474. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j2835. View

3.
Crow P, Gilbert H, Jones D, Ritchie A . The influence of histological diagnosis on the postoperative complication rate following trans-urethral resection of prostate (TURP). Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84(6):418-21. PMC: 2504213. DOI: 10.1308/003588402760978238. View

4.
Qian X, Liu H, Xu D, Xu L, Huang F, He W . Functional outcomes and complications following B-TURP versus HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of the literature and Meta-analysis. Aging Male. 2017; 20(3):184-191. DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2017.1295436. View

5.
Liu R, Liu J, Duan S, Cheng S, Chang Z, Cao H . Dynamic prostatic and laser-ablated lesion volume change after transperineal laser ablation in canine: preliminary observation and its clinical significance. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020; 37(1):1260-1267. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1842517. View