» Articles » PMID: 29537634

Reference Dosimetry Data and Modeling Challenges for Elekta Accelerators Based on IROC-Houston Site Visit Data

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2018 Mar 15
PMID 29537634
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Reference dosimetry data can provide an independent second check of acquired values when commissioning or validating a treatment planning system (TPS). The Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core at Houston (IROC-Houston) has measured numerous linear accelerators throughout its existence. The results of those measurements are given here, comparing accelerators and the agreement of measurement versus institutional TPS calculations.

Methods: Data from IROC-Houston on-site reviews from 2000 through 2014 were analyzed for all Elekta accelerators, approximately 50. For each, consistent point dose measurements were conducted for several basic parameters in a water phantom, including percentage depth dose, output factors, small-field output factors, off-axis factors, and wedge factors. The results were compared by accelerator type independently for 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV. Distributions of the measurements for each parameter are given, providing the mean and standard deviation. Each accelerator's measurements were also compared to its corresponding TPS calculation from the institution to determine the level of agreement, as well as determining which dosimetric parameters were most often in error.

Results: Accelerators were grouped by head type and reference dosimetric values were compiled. No class of linac had better overall agreement with its TPS, but percentage depth dose and output factors commonly agreed well, while small-field output factors, off-axis factors, and wedge factors often disagreed substantially from their TPS calculations.

Conclusion: Reference data has been collected and analyzed for numerous Elekta linacs, which provide an independent way for a physicist to double-check their own measurements to prevent gross treatment errors. In addition, treatment planning parameters more often in error have been highlighted, providing practical caution for physicists commissioning treatment planning systems for Elekta linacs.

Citing Articles

Characterizing the interplay of treatment parameters and complexity and their impact on performance on an IROC IMRT phantom using machine learning.

Mehrens H, Molineu A, Hernandez N, Court L, Howell R, Jaffray D Radiother Oncol. 2023; 182:109577.

PMID: 36841341 PMC: 10121814. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109577.


AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams.

Geurts M, Jacqmin D, Jones L, Kry S, Mihailidis D, Ohrt J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(9):e13641.

PMID: 35950259 PMC: 9512346. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13641.


The current status and shortcomings of stereotactic radiosurgery.

Mehrens H, Nguyen T, Edward S, Hartzell S, Glenn M, Branco D Neurooncol Adv. 2022; 4(1):vdac058.

PMID: 35664554 PMC: 9154323. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac058.


Photon beam modeling variations predict errors in IMRT dosimetry audits.

Glenn M, Brooks F, Peterson C, Howell R, Followill D, Pollard-Larkin J Radiother Oncol. 2021; 166:8-14.

PMID: 34748857 PMC: 8863621. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.021.


Dose calculation errors as a component of failing IROC lung and spine phantom irradiations.

Edward S, Glenn M, Peterson C, Balter P, Pollard-Larkin J, Howell R Med Phys. 2020; 47(9):4502-4508.

PMID: 32452027 PMC: 7686159. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14258.


References
1.
Watts R . Comparative measurements on a series of accelerators by the same vendor. Med Phys. 2000; 26(12):2581-5. DOI: 10.1118/1.598796. View

2.
Kry S, Dromgoole L, Alvarez P, Leif J, Molineu A, Taylor P . Radiation Therapy Deficiencies Identified During On-Site Dosimetry Visits by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston Quality Assurance Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 99(5):1094-1100. PMC: 5699963. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.013. View

3.
Ikoro N, Johnson D, Antich P . Characteristics of the 6-MV photon beam produced by a dual energy linear accelerator. Med Phys. 1987; 14(1):93-7. DOI: 10.1118/1.596113. View

4.
Fontenla D, Napoli J, Chui C . Beam characteristics of a new model of 6-MV linear accelerator. Med Phys. 1992; 19(2):343-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.596864. View

5.
Followill D, Kry S, Qin L, Lowenstein J, Molineu A, Alvarez P . The Radiological Physics Center's standard dataset for small field size output factors. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012; 13(5):3962. PMC: 5718235. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3962. View