» Articles » PMID: 29531788

Imaging in Diagnosis, Outcome Prediction and Monitoring of Large Vessel Vasculitis: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis Informing the EULAR Recommendations

Overview
Journal RMD Open
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2018 Mar 14
PMID 29531788
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To perform a systematic literature review on imaging techniques for diagnosis, outcome prediction and disease monitoring in large vessel vasculitis (LVV) informing the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for imaging in LVV.

Methods: Systematic literature review (until 10 March 2017) of diagnostic and prognostic studies enrolling >20 patients and investigating ultrasound, MRI, CT or positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with suspected and/or established primary LVV. Meta-analyses were conducted, whenever possible, obtaining pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity by fitting random effects models.

Results: Forty-three studies were included (39 on giant cell arteritis (GCA), 4 on Takayasu arteritis (TAK)). Ultrasound ('halo' sign) at temporal arteries (8 studies, 605 patients) and MRI of cranial arteries (6 studies, 509 patients) yielded pooled sensitivities of 77% (95% CI 62% to 87%) and 73% (95% CI 57% to 85%), respectively, compared with a clinical diagnosis of GCA. Corresponding specificities were 96% (95% CI 85% to 99%) and 88% (95% CI 81% to 92%). Two studies (93 patients) investigating PET for GCA diagnosis reported sensitivities of 67%-77% and specificities of 66%-100% as compared with clinical diagnosis or temporal artery biopsy. In TAK, one study each evaluated the role of magnetic resonance angiography and CT angiography for diagnostic purposes revealing both a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Studies on outcome prediction and monitoring disease activity/damage were limited and mainly descriptive.

Conclusions: Ultrasound and MRI provide a high diagnostic value for cranial GCA. More data on the role of imaging for diagnosis of extracranial large vessel GCA and TAK, as well as for outcome prediction and monitoring in LVV are warranted.

Citing Articles

Utilising multiple discharge coding will improve identification of patients with giant cell arteritis: a retrospective analysis of a hospital discharge dataset.

Dermawan A, Murdoch J, De Sousa J, Taylor A, Keen H Rheumatol Int. 2025; 45(3):58.

PMID: 39982544 PMC: 11845429. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-025-05814-6.


An in-depth comparison of vascular inflammation on ultrasound, FDG-PET/CT and MRI in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

van Nieuwland M, Nienhuis P, Haagsma C, van der Geest K, Wagenaar N, Appelman A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 39903226 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07088-3.


Isolated inflammatory involvement of the occipital artery in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: findings from a retrospective analysis and the critical role of MRI in diagnosis.

Guggenberger K, Riedling L, Kern D, Werner R, Vogt M, Frohlich M Rheumatol Int. 2025; 45(1):27.

PMID: 39804420 PMC: 11729197. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05765-4.


Unveiling the Uncommon: A Case Report of Horner's Syndrome as a Rare Glimpse Into Giant Cell Arteritis.

Barr E, Levesque J, Badir J, Dunston R, Ranasinghe T Case Rep Neurol Med. 2024; 2024:2503963.

PMID: 39691739 PMC: 11651727. DOI: 10.1155/crnm/2503963.


18F-FDG-PET/CT Scan for Detection of Large Vessel Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: Arteser Spanish Registry.

Estrada P, Dominguez-Alvaro M, Melero-Gonzalez R, De Miguel E, Silva-Diaz M, Valero J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458165 PMC: 11605220. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206215.


References
1.
Cinar I, Wang H, Stone J . Clinically isolated aortitis: pitfalls, progress, and possibilities. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2017; 29:23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2017.04.003. View

2.
Martinez-Rodriguez I, del Castillo-Matos R, Quirce R, Jimenez-Bonilla J, de Arcocha-Torres M, Ortega-Nava F . Comparison of early (60 min) and delayed (180 min) acquisition of 18F-FDG PET/CT in large vessel vasculitis. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2013; 32(4):222-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2012.12.004. View

3.
Habib H, Essa A, Hassan A . Color duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries: role in diagnosis and follow-up of suspected cases of temporal arteritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 31(2):231-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-011-1808-0. View

4.
Franke P, Markl M, Heinzelmann S, Vaith P, Burk J, Langer M . Evaluation of a 32-channel versus a 12-channel head coil for high-resolution post-contrast MRI in giant cell arteritis (GCA) at 3T. Eur J Radiol. 2014; 83(10):1875-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.06.022. View

5.
Luqmani R, Lee E, Singh S, Gillett M, Schmidt W, Bradburn M . The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Temporal Arteries in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20(90):1-238. PMC: 5165283. DOI: 10.3310/hta20900. View