» Articles » PMID: 27483045

High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Scalp Arteries for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2016 Aug 3
PMID 27483045
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the concordance between high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the scalp arteries and temporal artery biopsy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with suspected GCA. Participants underwent high-field 3T MRI of the scalp arteries followed by temporal artery biopsy. Arterial wall thickness and enhancement on multiplanar postcontrast T1-weighted spin-echo images were graded according to a published severity scale (range 0-3). MRI findings were compared with temporal artery biopsy results and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for GCA.

Results: One hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study. Temporal artery biopsy findings were positive in 31 patients (18.1%), and MRI findings were abnormal in 60 patients (35.1%). ACR criteria were met in 137 patients (80.1%). With temporal artery biopsy as the reference test, MRI had a sensitivity of 93.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 78.6-99.2) and a specificity of 77.9% (95% CI 70.1-84.4). The corresponding negative predictive value of MRI was 98.2% (95% CI 93.6-99.8) and positive predictive value was 48.3% (95% CI 35.2-61.6).

Conclusion: In patients with suspected GCA, normal findings on scalp artery MRI are very strongly associated with negative temporal artery biopsy findings. This suggests that MRI could be used as the initial diagnostic procedure in GCA, with temporal artery biopsy being reserved for patients with abnormal MRI findings.

Citing Articles

Enhancement within the orbits and superficial temporal artery: MRI clues to the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Sanchez G, Long T, Warner J, Chung L, Quigley 3rd E, Digre K Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2025; 37:102260.

PMID: 39931383 PMC: 11808515. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2025.102260.


An in-depth comparison of vascular inflammation on ultrasound, FDG-PET/CT and MRI in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

van Nieuwland M, Nienhuis P, Haagsma C, van der Geest K, Wagenaar N, Appelman A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 39903226 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07088-3.


Clinical, laboratory, and orbital imaging features of giant cell arteritis in comparison to non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropath: a single center case series.

Eldaya R, Yeh Y, Stunkel L, Parsons M, Van Stavern G Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025; 4():1498968.

PMID: 39776976 PMC: 11703802. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1498968.


Intracranial vasculopathy with MR vessel wall imaging: a case series.

Sin L, Lee Y, Chan W, Siu C, Tan C BJR Case Rep. 2024; 10(5):uaae036.

PMID: 39417007 PMC: 11483133. DOI: 10.1093/bjrcr/uaae036.


Optic Nerve Sheath Measurement on Ultrasound: A Novel Diagnostic Test for Giant Cell Arteritis.

Baalbaki H, Dube D, Ross C, Ducharme-Benard S, Hussein S, Meunier R ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024; 6(10):662-668.

PMID: 39037898 PMC: 11471948. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11729.