» Articles » PMID: 29503624

Individual Differences in Reward Sensitivity Modulate the Distinctive Effects of Conscious and Unconscious Rewards on Executive Performance

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Mar 6
PMID 29503624
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Executive control can be driven by conscious and unconscious monetary cues. This has raised the exciting question regarding the role of conscious and unconscious reward in the regulation of executive control. Similarities and differences have been uncovered between unconscious and conscious processing of monetary rewards. In the present study, we explored whether individual differences associated with reward sensitivity foster these variations on memory-updating-a core component process of executive control. Participants ( = 60) with low, medium, and high reward sensitivity were selected and performed a numerical memory-updating task. At the beginning of each trial, a high (1 euro) or a low (5 cents) reward was presented subliminally (24 ms) or supraliminally (300 ms). Participants earned the reward by responding correctly. Participants with low reward sensitivity performed better for the high reward only in the subliminal condition. For participants with medium reward sensitivity, performance improved with high reward in both subliminal and supraliminal conditions. When participants had high reward sensitivity scores, the effect of reward was stronger in the supraliminal condition than the subliminal condition. These results show that the distinctive effects of conscious and unconscious rewards on executive performance are modulated by individual differences in reward sensitivity. We discuss this finding with reference to models of conscious/unconscious processing of reward stimuli.

Citing Articles

Evidence for the Beneficial Effect of Reward on Working Memory: A Meta-Analytic Study.

Wang W, Yan X, He X, Qian J J Intell. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39330467 PMC: 11433210. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence12090088.


The processing of subthreshold visual temporal order is transitory and motivation-dependent.

Polgari P, Jovanovic L, van Wassenhove V, Giersch A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7699.

PMID: 37169810 PMC: 10175535. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34392-5.


Can we prevent social identity switches? An experimental-computational investigation.

Zinn A, Koschate M, Naserianhanzaei E, Lavric A Br J Soc Psychol. 2023; 62(3):1547-1565.

PMID: 37039361 PMC: 10947443. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12647.


Effortfulness of visual working memory: Gauged by physical exertion.

Xie W, Zhang W J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023; 152(7):2074-2093.

PMID: 36951745 PMC: 10293040. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001391.


Effect of methylphenidate on functional controllability: a preliminary study in medication-naïve children with ADHD.

Henry T, Fogleman N, Nugiel T, Cohen J Transl Psychiatry. 2022; 12(1):518.

PMID: 36528602 PMC: 9759578. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02283-4.


References
1.
Capa R, Bustin G, Cleeremans A, Hansenne M . Conscious and unconscious reward cues can affect a critical component of executive control. Exp Psychol. 2011; 58(5):370-5. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000104. View

2.
Boksem M, Tops M, Wester A, Meijman T, Lorist M . Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity. Brain Res. 2006; 1101(1):92-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.004. View

3.
Bijleveld E, Custers R, Aarts H . Adaptive reward pursuit: how effort requirements affect unconscious reward responses and conscious reward decisions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 141(4):728-42. DOI: 10.1037/a0027615. View

4.
Chiew K, Braver T . Dissociable influences of reward motivation and positive emotion on cognitive control. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014; 14(2):509-29. PMC: 4072919. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0280-0. View

5.
Haber S, Knutson B . The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 35(1):4-26. PMC: 3055449. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.129. View