» Articles » PMID: 29492775

Healing Score of the Xinsorb Scaffold in the Treatment of De Novo Lesions: 6-month Imaging Outcomes

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Mar 2
PMID 29492775
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objectives of this study are to assess the healing score (HS) and neointimal thickness of the Xinsorb scaffold, and explore the relationships between the implanted patterns, neointimal thickness, and HS. The Xinsorb bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold is the first domestically designed and fabricated bioresorbable scaffold in China. The 6-month follow-up found it to be safe and effective in the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions. The Xinsorb scaffolds were implanted in 30 patients with symptomatic ischemic coronary disease. A 6-month follow-up was performed in a subset of 19 patients; the HS and neointimal thickness were evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Struts were classified as ApposedCovered, ApposedUncovered, MalapposedCovered, MalapposedUncovered, jailing and presence of intraluminal masses. The implanted pressure, implanted duration, and post-expansion pressure were recorded during the operation. We evaluated the relationship between the HS or neointimal thickness and the implanted pressure, holding time, and post-expansion pressure. The device and procedure success rates were both 100%. No major adverse cardiac or scaffold-thrombus related events occurred. At 6 months, 12,295 struts were analyzed to determine the HS (6.23) and neointimal thickness (0.1021 ± 0.05718 mm) in the Xinsorb scaffolds. There was a strong negative relationship between the HS and the implantation duration (Pearson r = - 0.518, p = 0.023). A significant negative relationship also existed between the HS and post-dilatation (Pearson r = - 0.631, p = 0.004). The Xinsorb scaffold HS appears negative correlated with the implanted duration and post-dilatation. We will further evaluate the HS of randomized controlled trial of the Xissorb scaffold.

Citing Articles

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions.

Peng X, Qu W, Jia Y, Wang Y, Yu B, Tian J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020; 7:589571.

PMID: 33330651 PMC: 7733966. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571.


Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Achievements, Future, and Sustainability in Asia.

Han F, Wang J, Ding L, Hu Y, Li W, Yuan Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:83.

PMID: 32266221 PMC: 7105900. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00083.


Cardiovascular imaging 2018 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Reiber J, Pereira G, Bezerra H, De Sutter J, Schoenhagen P, Stillman A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(7):1175-1188.

PMID: 30868339 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01579-9.

References
1.
Suwannasom P, Onuma Y, Benit E, Gach O, von Birgelen C, Hofma S . Evaluation of vascular healing of polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in native coronary artery stenosis: a serial follow-up at three and six months with optical coherence tomography imaging. EuroIntervention. 2016; 12(5):e574-83. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I5A97. View

2.
Wu Y, Shen L, Ge L, Wang Q, Qian J, Zhang F . Six-month outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in treating single de novo lesions in human coronary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 87 Suppl 1:630-7. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26404. View

3.
Muramatsu T, Garcia-Garcia H, Lee I, Bruining N, Onuma Y, Serruys P . Quantitative optical frequency domain imaging assessment of in-stent structures in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of imaging sampling rate. Circ J. 2012; 76(12):2822-31. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0536. View

4.
Costa Jr J, Mintz G, Carlier S, Fujii K, Sano K, Kimura M . Intravascular ultrasound assessment of drug-eluting stent expansion. Am Heart J. 2007; 153(2):297-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.026. View

5.
Chen J, Wu Y, Shen L, Zhang F, Yao Z, Yin J . First-in-man Implantation of the XINSORB Bioresorbable Sirolimus-eluting Scaffold in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015; 128(9):1275-6. PMC: 4831559. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.156155. View