» Articles » PMID: 19671534

Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of the Acute Effects of Stent Implantation on the Vessel Wall: a Systematic Quantitative Approach

Overview
Journal Heart
Date 2009 Aug 13
PMID 19671534
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To observe and characterise vessel injury after stenting using optical coherence tomography (OCT), to propose a systematic OCT classification for periprocedural vessel trauma, to evaluate its frequency in stable versus unstable patients and to assess its clinical impact during the hospitalisation period.

Setting: Stenting causes vessel injury.

Design And Interventions: All consecutive patients in whom OCT was performed after stent implantation were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of tissue prolapse, intra-stent dissection and edge dissection were performed.

Results: Seventy-three patients (80 vessels) were analysed. Tissue prolapse within the stented segment was visible in 78/80 vessels (97.5%). Median number of tissue prolapse sites was 8 (IQR 4-19), mean (SD) area 1.04 (0.9) mm(2). Intra-stent dissection flaps were visible in 69/80 vessels (86.3%) (median number 3 (IQR 1.25-6), maximum flap length 450 (220) microm). Fifty-five out of 80 vessels (68.8%) showed dissection cavities (median number 2 (IQR 0-4.75), maximum depth 340 (170) microm). Edge dissection was visible in 20 vessels (mean (SD) length flap 744 (439) microm). The frequency of tissue prolapse or intra-stent dissection was similar in stable and unstable patients (95.6% vs 100%, p = 0.5 for tissue prolapse; 91.1% vs 82.9%, p = 0.3 for intra-stent dissection). There were no events during the hospitalisation period.

Conclusions: OCT allows a detailed visualisation of vessel injury after stent implantation and enables a systematic classification and quantification in vivo. In this study, frequency of tissue prolapse or intra-stent dissections after stenting was high, irrespective of the clinical presentation of the patients, and was not associated with clinical events during hospitalisation.

Citing Articles

Consensus of the National Heart Center in collaboration With the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging.

Alasnag M, Alameer M, Alshehri A, Alosaimi H, Alqoofi F, Alzayer H J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024; 36(2):137-157.

PMID: 39469526 PMC: 11518001. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1387.


Consensus of National Heart Center and the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Current Landscape of the Management of Intracoronary Calcification in Saudi Arabia.

Al-Shaibi K, Alasnag M, AlShemmari O, AlSaleh A, AlKashkari W, AlMutairi F J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024; 36(2):158-173.

PMID: 39469524 PMC: 11518036. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1385.


Optical frequency domain imaging-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: the OPINION ACS randomised trial.

Otake H, Kubo T, Hibi K, Natsumeda M, Ishida M, Kataoka T EuroIntervention. 2024; 20(17):e1086-e1097.

PMID: 39219363 PMC: 11352543. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00314.


Post-stenting angiographically silent coronary dissection: OCT comes to the rescue.

Khanna R, Ghosh A, Sahu A, Goel P Br J Cardiol. 2022; 28(4):41.

PMID: 35747062 PMC: 9063700. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2021.041.


Optical coherence tomography-guided drug coated balloon in non-small de novo coronary artery lesions: a prospective clinical research.

Li L, Zhao L, Wang J, Li Z, Shi Y, Wang G Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(10):11617-11624.

PMID: 34786087 PMC: 8581893.