» Articles » PMID: 29487508

To Do or Not to Do: Dopamine, Affordability and the Economics of Opportunity

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 1
PMID 29487508
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Five years ago, we introduced the thrift hypothesis of dopamine (DA), suggesting that the primary role of DA in adaptive behavior is regulating behavioral energy expenditure to match the prevailing economic conditions of the environment. Here we elaborate that hypothesis with several new ideas. First, we introduce the concept of affordability, suggesting that costs must necessarily be evaluated with respect to the availability of resources to the organism, which computes a value not only for the potential reward opportunity, but also the value of resources expended. Placing both costs and benefits within the context of the larger economy in which the animal is functioning requires consideration of the different timescales against which to compute resource availability, or average reward rate. Appropriate windows of computation for tracking resources requires corresponding neural substrates that operate on these different timescales. In discussing temporal patterns of DA signaling, we focus on a neglected form of DA plasticity and adaptation, changes in the physical substrate of the DA system itself, such as up- and down-regulation of receptors or release probability. We argue that changes in the DA substrate itself fundamentally alter its computational function, which we propose mediates adaptations to longer temporal horizons and economic conditions. In developing our hypothesis, we focus on DA D2 receptors (D2R), arguing that D2R implements a form of "cost control" in response to the environmental economy, serving as the "brain's comptroller". We propose that the balance between the direct and indirect pathway, regulated by relative expression of D1 and D2 DA receptors, implements affordability. Finally, as we review data, we discuss limitations in current approaches that impede fully investigating the proposed hypothesis and highlight alternative, more semi-naturalistic strategies more conducive to neuroeconomic investigations on the role of DA in adaptive behavior.

Citing Articles

Neural reward system reflects individual value comparison strategy in cost-benefit decisions.

Corbi Z, Soutschek A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1488.

PMID: 39533059 PMC: 11557971. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07210-5.


Striatal dopamine integrates cost, benefit, and motivation.

Eshel N, Touponse G, Wang A, Osterman A, Shank A, Groome A Neuron. 2023; 112(3):500-514.e5.

PMID: 38016471 PMC: 10922131. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.10.038.


Toward a Unifying Account of Dopamine's Role in Cost-Benefit Decision Making.

Soutschek A, Jetter A, Tobler P Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023; 3(2):179-186.

PMID: 37124350 PMC: 10140448. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.02.010.


A process model account of the role of dopamine in intertemporal choice.

Soutschek A, Tobler P Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 36884013 PMC: 9995109. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.83734.


Dopamine Transporter Is a Master Regulator of Dopaminergic Neural Network Connectivity.

Miller D, Guenther D, Maurer A, Hansen C, Zalesky A, Khoshbouei H J Neurosci. 2021; 41(25):5453-5470.

PMID: 33980544 PMC: 8221606. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0223-21.2021.


References
1.
Tirotta E, Fontaine V, Picetti R, Lombardi M, Samad T, Oulad-Abdelghani M . Signaling by dopamine regulates D2 receptors trafficking at the membrane. Cell Cycle. 2008; 7(14):2241-8. DOI: 10.4161/cc.7.14.6307. View

2.
Redgrave P, Prescott T, Gurney K . The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem?. Neuroscience. 1999; 89(4):1009-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00319-4. View

3.
Li Y, South T, Han M, Chen J, Wang R, Huang X . High-fat diet decreases tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA expression irrespective of obesity susceptibility in mice. Brain Res. 2009; 1268:181-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.075. View

4.
Heni M, Kullmann S, Preissl H, Fritsche A, Haring H . Impaired insulin action in the human brain: causes and metabolic consequences. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015; 11(12):701-11. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.173. View

5.
Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague P . A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science. 1997; 275(5306):1593-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1593. View