Converging and Diverging Needs Between Patients and Providers Who Are Collecting and Using Patient-generated Health Data: an Integrative Review

Overview

Journal J Am Med Inform Assoc

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2018 Feb 23

PMID 29471330

Citations 35

Authors

Meghan J Reading

Jacqueline A Merrill

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: This integrative review identifies convergent and divergent areas of need for collecting and using patient-generated health data (PGHD) identified by patients and providers (i.e., physicians, nurses, advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, and dietitians).

Methods: A systematic search of 9 scholarly databases targeted peer-reviewed studies published after 2010 that reported patients' and/or providers' needs for incorporating PGHD in clinical care. The studies were assessed for quality and bias with the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. The results section of each article was coded to themes inductively developed to categorize patient and provider needs. Distinct claims were extracted and areas of convergence and divergence identified.

Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. All had moderate to low risk of bias. Three themes (clinical, logistic, and technological needs), and 13 subthemes emerged. Forty-eight claims were extracted. Four were divergent and twenty were convergent. The remainder was discussed by only patients or only providers.

Conclusion: As momentum gains for integrating PGHD into clinical care, this analysis of primary source data is critical to understanding the requirements of the 2 groups directly involved in collection and use of PGHD.

Citing Articles

Implementation of digital remote postoperative monitoring in routine practice: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.

McLean K, Sgro A, Brown L, Buijs L, Mozolowski K, Daines L BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):307.

PMID: 39434121 PMC: 11492749. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02670-5.

The role of artificial intelligence for the application of integrating electronic health records and patient-generated data in clinical decision support.

Ye J, Woods D, Jordan N, Starren J AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2024; 2024:459-467.

PMID: 38827061 PMC: 11141850.

Use of Patient-Generated Health Data From Consumer-Grade Devices by Health Care Professionals in the Clinic: Systematic Review.

Guardado S, Karampela M, Isomursu M, Grundstrom C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49320.

PMID: 38820580 PMC: 11179023. DOI: 10.2196/49320.

Evaluating Pharmacists' Time Collecting Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Data.

Perdew C, Nguyen E Fed Pract. 2024; 40(Suppl 6):S12-S15.

PMID: 38812587 PMC: 11132189. DOI: 10.12788/fp.0388.

Patient and Provider Perspectives About the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data During Pregnancy: Qualitative Exploratory Study.

MacEwan S, Olvera R, Jonnalagadda P, Fareed N, McAlearney A JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e52397.

PMID: 38718395 PMC: 11112476. DOI: 10.2196/52397.

References

. Medicare Program; CY 2018 Updates to the Quality Payment Program; and Quality Payment Program: Extreme and Uncontrollable Circumstance Policy for the Transition Year. Final rule with comment period and interim final rule with comment period. Fed Regist. 2017; 82(220):53568-4229. View

Howie L, Hirsch B, Locklear T, Abernethy A . Assessing the value of patient-generated data to comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(7):1220-8. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0225. View

Shaw R, Bonnet J, Modarai F, George A, Shahsahebi M . Mobile health technology for personalized primary care medicine. Am J Med. 2015; 128(6):555-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.005. View

Dlugasch L, Ugarriza D . Self-monitoring of blood glucose experiences of adults with type 2 diabetes. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013; 26(6):323-9. DOI: 10.1002/2327-6924.12042. View

Pluye P, Gagnon M, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J . A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 46(4):529-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009. View

Wood W, Bennett A, Basch E . Emerging uses of patient generated health data in clinical research. Mol Oncol. 2014; 9(5):1018-24. PMC: 5528746. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.08.006. View

Bauer A, Thielke S, Katon W, Unutzer J, Arean P . Aligning health information technologies with effective service delivery models to improve chronic disease care. Prev Med. 2014; 66:167-72. PMC: 4137765. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.017. View

Pluye P, Hong Q . Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013; 35:29-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440. View

Sanger P, Hartzler A, Lordon R, Armstrong C, Lober W, Evans H . A patient-centered system in a provider-centered world: challenges of incorporating post-discharge wound data into practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23(3):514-25. PMC: 6375197. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv183. View

10.

Lind L, Carlgren G, Karlsson D . Old-and With Severe Heart Failure: Telemonitoring by Using Digital Pen Technology in Specialized Homecare: System Description, Implementation, and Early Results. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016; 34(8):360-8. DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000252. View

11.

Lv N, Xiao L, Simmons M, Rosas L, Chan A, Entwistle M . Personalized Hypertension Management Using Patient-Generated Health Data Integrated With Electronic Health Records (EMPOWER-H): Six-Month Pre-Post Study. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(9):e311. PMC: 5627043. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7831. View

12.

Broman K, Oyefule O, Phillips S, Baucom R, Holzman M, Sharp K . Postoperative Care Using a Secure Online Patient Portal: Changing the (Inter)Face of General Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221(6):1057-66. PMC: 4662904. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.429. View

13.

Lai A, Hsueh P, Choi Y, Austin R . Present and Future Trends in Consumer Health Informatics and Patient-Generated Health Data. Yearb Med Inform. 2017; 26(1):152-159. PMC: 6239232. DOI: 10.15265/IY-2017-016. View

14.

Huba N, Zhang Y . Designing patient-centered personal health records (PHRs): health care professionals' perspective on patient-generated data. J Med Syst. 2012; 36(6):3893-905. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-012-9861-z. View

15.

Greenwood D, Gee P, Fatkin K, Peeples M . A Systematic Review of Reviews Evaluating Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11(5):1015-1027. PMC: 5951000. DOI: 10.1177/1932296817713506. View

16.

Hvitfeldt Forsberg H, Nelson E, Reid R, Grossman D, Mastanduno M, Weiss L . Using patient-reported outcomes in routine practice: three novel use cases and implications. J Ambul Care Manage. 2015; 38(2):188-95. DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000052. View

17.

Chouvarda I, Goulis D, Lambrinoudaki I, Maglaveras N . Connected health and integrated care: Toward new models for chronic disease management. Maturitas. 2015; 82(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.03.015. View

18.

Hartzler A, Izard J, Dalkin B, Mikles S, Gore J . Design and feasibility of integrating personalized PRO dashboards into prostate cancer care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 23(1):38-47. PMC: 5009933. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv101. View

19.

Glasgow R, Christiansen S, Kurz D, King D, Woolley T, Faber A . Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1):e9. PMC: 3221359. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1391. View

20.

Nundy S, Lu C, Hogan P, Mishra A, Peek M . Using Patient-Generated Health Data From Mobile Technologies for Diabetes Self-Management Support: Provider Perspectives From an Academic Medical Center. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(1):74-82. PMC: 4454095. DOI: 10.1177/1932296813511727. View