CSF Neurogranin or Tau Distinguish Typical and Atypical Alzheimer Disease
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To assess whether high levels of cerebrospinal fluid neurogranin are found in atypical as well as typical Alzheimer's disease.
Methods: Immunoassays were used to measure cerebrospinal fluid neurogranin in 114 participants including healthy controls ( = 27), biomarker-proven amnestic Alzheimer's disease ( = 68), and the atypical visual variant of Alzheimer's ( = 19) according to international criteria. CSF total-tau, Aβ42, and neurofilament light concentrations were investigated using commercially available assays. All affected individuals had T1-weighted volumetric MR images available for analysis of whole and regional brain volumes. Associations between neurogranin, brain volumes, total-tau, Aβ42, and neurofilament light were assessed.
Results: Median cerebrospinal fluid neurogranin concentrations were higher in typical and atypical Alzheimer's compared to controls ( < 0.001 and = 0.005). Both neurogranin and total-tau concentrations, but not neurofilament light and Aβ42, were higher in typical Alzheimer's compared to atypical patients ( = 0.004 and = 0.03). There were significant differences in the left hippocampus and right and left superior parietal lobules in atypical patients, which were larger ( = 0.03) and smaller ( = 0.001 and < 0.001), respectively, compared to typical patients. We found no evidence of associations between neurogranin and brain volumes but a strong association with total-tau ( < 0.001) and a weaker association with neurofilament light ( = 0.005).
Interpretation: These results show significant differences in neurogranin and total-tau between typical and atypical patients, which may relate to factors other than disease topography. The differential relationships between neurogranin, total-tau and neurofilament light in the Alzheimer's variants, provide evidence for mechanistically distinct and coupled markers of neurodegeneration.
Atypical clinical variants of Alzheimer's disease: are they really atypical?.
Whitwell J Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1352822.
PMID: 38482142 PMC: 10933030. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1352822.
Piccoli T, Blandino V, Maniscalco L, Matranga D, Graziano F, Guajana F Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(18).
PMID: 36142742 PMC: 9501545. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810831.
Liu W, Lin H, Lin M, Yu Y, Liu H, Dai Y Neural Regen Res. 2022; 17(11):2381-2390.
PMID: 35535875 PMC: 9120706. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.335832.
Giampietri L, Belli E, Beatino M, Giannoni S, Palermo G, Campese N Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(4).
PMID: 35453843 PMC: 9029739. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040796.
Saunders T, Gadd D, Spires-Jones T, King D, Ritchie C, Muniz-Terrera G Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 56(9):5650-5713.
PMID: 35338546 PMC: 9790745. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15656.