» Articles » PMID: 29456918

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review of Single-Level, Multilevel, and Hybrid Procedures

Overview
Journal Global Spine J
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Feb 20
PMID 29456918
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Systematic review.

Objectives: Degenerative disc disease and spondylosis resulting in radiculopathy and retrodiscal myelopathy are among the most frequently encountered cervical spinal disorders. Traditionally, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has successfully achieved neural decompression and restored intradiscal height in these conditions. Unfortunately, nonunion and iatrogenic adjacent segment pathology associated with fusion procedures in the cervical spine has led to an interest in motion-preserving procedures. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed in hopes of preserving cervical biomechanics while mitigating the complications associated with ACDF. Through a systematic review of both published and ongoing studies on single- and multilevel CDA, and hybrid surgeries, we aim to provide evidence for their safety and efficacy in the treatment of various cervical pathologies.

Methods: A systematic search of several large databases, including Cochrane Central, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry was conducted to identify published studies and ongoing clinical trials on CDA and hybrid surgery.

Results: Among the relevant studies reviewed, 3 were randomized controlled trials, 2 systematic reviews, as well as multiple prospective case series, biomechanical studies, and meta-analyses.

Conclusion: Over the past decade, multiple high-quality studies have shown that single-level CDA can offer equivalent clinical outcomes with a reduction in secondary procedures and total cost when compared to ACDF. However, more recently there has been an increasing prevalence of 2-level CDA and hybrid surgery. Although the data regarding these multilevel procedures is less robust, it appears that they may be as effective as their single-level counterparts.

Citing Articles

Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference.

Perez-Albela A, Hanna J, Daniels A, Basques B N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100588.

PMID: 40065829 PMC: 11891707. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100588.


Comparison of the efficacy of ROI-C cage with Zero-P device in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of cervical degenerative disc disease: a two-year follow-up study.

Wu P, Yang S, Wang Y, Wu Q, Zhang Y Front Surg. 2024; 11:1392725.

PMID: 38872722 PMC: 11172672. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392725.


Segment selection for fusion and artificial disc replacement in the hybrid surgical treatment of noncontiguous cervical spondylosis: a finite element analysis.

Sun X, Huang J, Zhang Q, Cao L, Liu Y, Song Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1345319.

PMID: 38633668 PMC: 11021715. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1345319.


Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Rationale, Designs, and Results of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Robertson D, Ton A, Brown M, Shahrestani S, Mills E, Wang J Int J Spine Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 38413235 PMC: 11535766. DOI: 10.14444/8586.


Specialty Impact on Patient Outcomes: Paving a Way for an Integrated Approach to Spinal Disorders.

Kuruba V, Cherukuri A, Arul S, Alzarooni A, Biju S, Hassan T Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e45962.

PMID: 37900519 PMC: 10600402. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45962.


References
1.
Lind B, Sihlbom H, Nordwall A, Malchau H . Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70(9):692-5. View

2.
Jia Z, Mo Z, Ding F, He Q, Fan Y, Ruan D . Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23(8):1619-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3389-5. View

3.
Villavicencio A, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, Thramann J . The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J. 2007; 7(2):148-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.009. View

4.
Boselie T, Willems P, van Mameren H, de Bie R, Benzel E, van Santbrink H . Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(17):E1096-107. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182994a32. View

5.
Pimenta L, McAfee P, Cappuccino A, Cunningham B, Diaz R, Coutinho E . Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(12):1337-44. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318059af12. View