» Articles » PMID: 29454767

Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Feb 19
PMID 29454767
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The authors developed a fully automated framework to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) from contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging and evaluated its diagnostic performance in patients.

Background: Fully quantitative CMR perfusion pixel maps were previously validated with microsphere MBF measurements and showed potential in clinical applications, but the methods required laborious manual processes and were excessively time-consuming.

Methods: CMR perfusion imaging was performed on 80 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and 17 healthy volunteers. Significant CAD was defined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as ≥70% stenosis. Nonsignificant CAD was defined by: 1) QCA as <70% stenosis; or 2) coronary computed tomography angiography as <30% stenosis and a calcium score of 0 in all vessels. Automatically generated MBF maps were compared with manual quantification on healthy volunteers. Diagnostic performance of the automated MBF pixel maps was analyzed on patients using absolute MBF, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and relative measurements of MBF and MPR.

Results: The correlation between automated and manual quantification was excellent (r = 0.96). Stress MBF and MPR in the ischemic zone were lower than those in the remote myocardium in patients with significant CAD (both p < 0.001). Stress MBF and MPR in the remote zone of the patients were lower than those in the normal volunteers (both p < 0.001). All quantitative metrics had good area under the curve (0.864 to 0.926), sensitivity (82.9% to 91.4%), and specificity (75.6% to 91.1%) on per-patient analysis. On a per-vessel analysis of the quantitative metrics, area under the curve (0.837 to 0.864), sensitivity (75.0% to 82.7%), and specificity (71.8% to 80.9%) were good.

Conclusions: Fully quantitative CMR MBF pixel maps can be generated automatically, and the results agree well with manual quantification. These methods can discriminate regional perfusion variations and have high diagnostic performance for detecting significant CAD. (Technical Development of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging; NCT00027170).

Citing Articles

Prevalence and prognostic significance of reduced myocardial perfusion reserve in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance.

Yang Y, Qin D, Li C, Tang L, Wang S, Chen X Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40045071 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11474-8.


Quantitative perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals compromised myocardial perfusion in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

Vink C, Borodzicz-Jazdzyk S, de Jong E, Woudstra J, van de Hoef T, Chamuleau S Clin Res Cardiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39966158 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-025-02606-7.


Heart-brain microvascular MRI study: protocol for a multicentre, observational, cohort study in the UK assessing associations between small vessel disease of the heart and brain.

Bradley C, Orchard V, Sykes R, McKinley G, McConnachie A, Donnelly P BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e088372.

PMID: 39806582 PMC: 11667430. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088372.


Assessing microvascular dysfunction and predicting long-term prognosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance quantitative stress perfusion.

Tang L, Zhao W, Li K, Tian L, Zhou X, Guo H J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024; 27(1):101134.

PMID: 39675481 PMC: 11761856. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101134.


Diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease.

Hoek R, Borodzicz-Jazdzyk S, van Diemen P, Somsen Y, W de Winter R, Jukema R Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 26(2):207-217.

PMID: 39382154 PMC: 11781829. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae262.


References
1.
Zarinabad N, Chiribiri A, Hautvast G, Ishida M, Schuster A, Cvetkovic Z . Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance. Feasibility and methods comparison. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 68(6):1994-2004. PMC: 7611327. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24195. View

2.
Christian T, Rettmann D, Aletras A, Liao S, Taylor J, Balaban R . Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):677-84. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323030573. View

3.
Kellman P, Hansen M, Nielles-Vallespin S, Nickander J, Themudo R, Ugander M . Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19(1):43. PMC: 5383963. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0355-5. View

4.
Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Klein C . Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2000; 101(12):1379-83. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1379. View

5.
Gatehouse P, Elkington A, Ablitt N, Yang G, Pennell D, Firmin D . Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20054. View