» Articles » PMID: 29429141

Utility of Second-generation Single-energy Metal Artifact Reduction in Helical Lung Computed Tomography for Patients with Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation After Coil Embolization

Overview
Journal Jpn J Radiol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Feb 12
PMID 29429141
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The quality of images acquired using single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on helical lung computed tomography (CT) in patients with pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) after coil embolization was retrospectively evaluated.

Materials And Methods: CT images were reconstructed with and without SEMAR. Twenty-seven lesions [20 patients (2 males, 18 females), mean age 61.2 ± 11.0 years; number of embolization coils, 9.8 ± 5.0] on contrast-enhanced CT and 18 lesions of non-enhanced lung CT concurrently performed were evaluated. Regions of interest were positioned around the coils and mean standard deviation value was compared as noise index. Two radiologists visually evaluated metallic coil artifacts using a four-point scale: 4 = minimal; 3 = mild; 2 = strong; 1 = extensive.

Results: Noise index was significantly improved with SEMAR versus without SEMAR (median [interquartile range]; 194.4 [161.6-211.9] Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 243.9 [220.4-286.0] HU; p < 0.001). Visual score was significantly improved with SEMAR versus without SEMAR (Reader 1, 3 [3] vs.1 [1]; Reader 2, 3 [3] vs.1 [1]; p < 0.001). Significant differences were similarly demonstrated on lung CT (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: SEMAR provided clear chest CT images in patients who underwent PAVM coil embolization.

Citing Articles

Vascular Malformations and Tumors: A Review of Classification and Imaging Features for Cardiothoracic Radiologists.

Ota Y, Lee E, Sella E, Agarwal P Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023; 5(4):e220328.

PMID: 37693195 PMC: 10483253. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.220328.


Coil volume embolization ratio for preventing recanalization after portal vein embolization.

Maruyama M, Yoshizako T, Ando S, Nakamura M, Tajima Y, Kitagaki H Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021; 27(3):366-371.

PMID: 34003123 PMC: 8136538. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2021.20043.


Comparison of quantitative measurements of four manufacturer's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging with a self-made acrylic phantom.

Chou R, Chi H, Lin Y, Ying L, Chao Y, Lin C Technol Health Care. 2020; 28(S1):273-287.

PMID: 32364160 PMC: 7369061. DOI: 10.3233/THC-209028.


Subtraction CTA: An Alternative Imaging Option for the Follow-Up of Flow-Diverter-Treated Aneurysms?.

Duarte Conde M, de Korte A, Meijer F, Aquarius R, Boogaarts H, Bartels R AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(11):2051-2056.

PMID: 30287460 PMC: 7655363. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5817.

References
1.
Fang J, Zhang D, Wilcox C, Heidinger B, Raptopoulos V, Brook A . Metal implants on CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction algorithms for reduction of metal artifacts with single energy and spectral CT scanning in a phantom model. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42(3):742-748. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-1023-1. View

2.
Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, Fukumoto W, Iida M, Baba Y . Coronary CT angiography in patients with implanted cardiac devices: initial experience with the metal artefact reduction technique. Br J Radiol. 2016; 89(1067):20160493. PMC: 5124846. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160493. View

3.
Shovlin C, Letarte M . Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia and pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: issues in clinical management and review of pathogenic mechanisms. Thorax. 1999; 54(8):714-29. PMC: 1745557. DOI: 10.1136/thx.54.8.714. View

4.
Subhas N, Polster J, Obuchowski N, Primak A, Dong F, Herts B . Imaging of Arthroplasties: Improved Image Quality and Lesion Detection With Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction, a New CT Metal Artifact Reduction Technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207(2):378-85. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15850. View

5.
Trerotola S, Pyeritz R . PAVM embolization: an update. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(4):837-45. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5230. View