» Articles » PMID: 29408542

Particle Size Distribution of Selected Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Products

Overview
Date 2018 Feb 7
PMID 29408542
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dosimetry models can be used to predict the dose of inhaled material, but they require several parameters including particle size distribution. The reported particle size distributions for aerosols from electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products vary widely and don't always identify a specific product. A low-flow cascade impactor was used to determine the particle size distribution [mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD); geometric standard deviation (GSD)] from 20 different cartridge based ENDS products. To assess losses and vapor phase amount, collection efficiency of the system was measured by comparing the collected mass in the impactor to the difference in ENDS product mass. The levels of nicotine, glycerin, propylene glycol, water, and menthol in the formulations of each product were also measured. Regardless of the ENDS product formulation, the MMAD of all tested products was similar and ranged from 0.9 to 1.2 μm with a GSD ranging from 1.7 to 2.2. There was no consistent pattern of change in the MMAD and GSD as a function of number of puffs (cartridge life). The collection efficiency indicated that 9%-26% of the generated mass was deposited in the collection system or was in the vapor phase. The particle size distribution data are suitable for use in aerosol dosimetry programs.

Citing Articles

Physical and Chemical Characterization of Aerosols Produced from Commercial Nicotine Salt-Based E-Liquids.

Harris T Chem Res Toxicol. 2024; 38(1):115-128.

PMID: 39654291 PMC: 11752517. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00315.


Multidisciplinary approaches in electronic nicotine delivery systems pulmonary toxicology: emergence of living and non-living bioinspired engineered systems.

Benam K Commun Eng. 2024; 3(1):123.

PMID: 39227652 PMC: 11372223. DOI: 10.1038/s44172-024-00276-3.


An Approach to Flavor Chemical Thermal Degradation Analysis.

Oldham M, Jeong L, Gillman I Toxics. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38250972 PMC: 10819574. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12010016.


Influence of puff topographies on e-liquid heating temperature, emission characteristics and modeled lung deposition of Puff Bar.

Ranpara A, Stefaniak A, Fernandez E, Bowers L, Arnold E, LeBouf R Aerosol Sci Technol. 2023; 57(5):450-466.

PMID: 37969359 PMC: 10641718. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2023.2190786.


Effects of Device Settings and E-Liquid Characteristics on Mouth-Throat Losses of Nicotine Delivered with Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).

Hosseini S, Gholap V, Halquist M, Golshahi L J Aerosol Sci. 2023; 171.

PMID: 37092025 PMC: 10121190. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106178.