» Articles » PMID: 29392167

The Advertising Strategies of Early E-cigarette Brand Leaders in the United States

Overview
Journal Tob Regul Sci
Date 2018 Feb 3
PMID 29392167
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We examined differential advertising strategies used by 4 major United States e-cigarette companies with differential affiliations with the traditional tobacco industry (ie, Njoy - independent, Blu - acquired, Vuse and MarkTen - launched by cigarette companies) over time.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study regarding e-cigarette adspend, adspend per media channel (eg, TV, print), and advertising messaging strategies among these 4 top e-cigarette brands from January 2013 through December 2015.

Results: E-cigarette adspend increased from $59 million in 2013 to $91 million in 2014, followed by a sharp decline to $37 million in 2015. These companies showed distinct spending trajectories overall and across media channels, with Njoy and Vuse spending a higher proportion of their dollars on TV and Blu and MarkTen spending more on print. Marketing messages were also different by company. Key themes included switching from cigarettes (particularly by Njoy and Blu), circumventing smoke-free policies (particularly by Blu), and technological advancement (particularly by Vuse and MarkTen).

Conclusions: These e-cigarette brands have shifted their adspend, use of media channels, and advertising messaging strategies over time. Some differing strategies may reflect the different affiliations of each brand to the traditional cigarette industry.

Citing Articles

Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Advertisement Trends After US Federal Policy Changes.

Shi R, Khayat A, Lee J, Garrison K, Jebai R, Wackowski O JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2459188.

PMID: 39937476 PMC: 11822544. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59188.


The Economics of Tobacco Regulation: A Comprehensive Review.

DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Lovenheim M J Econ Lit. 2023; 60(3):883-970.

PMID: 37075070 PMC: 10072869. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20201482.


PMI's IQOS and cigarette ads in Israeli media: a content analysis across regulatory periods and target population subgroups.

Khayat A, Berg C, Levine H, Rodnay M, Abroms L, Romm K Tob Control. 2022; 33(e1):e54-e61.

PMID: 36418166 PMC: 10203057. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057671.


IQOS and cigarette advertising across regulatory periods and population groups in Israel: a longitudinal analysis.

Khayat A, Levine H, Berg C, Shauly-Aharonov M, Manor O, Abroms L Tob Control. 2022; 33(e1):e3-e10.

PMID: 36368887 PMC: 10172385. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057585.


Subculture wars: The struggle for the vape industry.

Thirlway F Br J Sociol. 2022; 74(1):3-16.

PMID: 36329664 PMC: 10092283. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12981.


References
1.
Chen X, Cruz T, Schuster D, Unger J, Johnson C . Receptivity to protobacco media and its impact on cigarette smoking among ethnic minority youth in California. J Health Commun. 2002; 7(2):95-111. DOI: 10.1080/10810730290087987. View

2.
Hartmann-Boyce J, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Begh R, Stead L, Hajek P . Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 9:CD010216. PMC: 6457845. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub3. View

3.
Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, Morjaria J, Caruso M, Russo C . EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66317. PMC: 3691171. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066317. View

4.
Paynter J, Edwards R . The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(1):25-35. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntn002. View

5.
Gartner C, Hall W, Chapman S, Freeman B . Should the health community promote smokeless tobacco (snus) as a harm reduction measure?. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(7):e185. PMC: 1904463. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040185. View