» Articles » PMID: 29373039

Contraceptive Method Choice Among Young Adults: Influence of Individual and Relationship Factors

Overview
Journal J Sex Res
Publisher Routledge
Date 2018 Jan 27
PMID 29373039
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because decisions related to contraceptive behavior are often made by young adults in the context of specific relationships, the relational context likely influences use of contraceptives. Data presented here are from in-person structured interviews with 536 Black, Hispanic, and White young adults from East Los Angeles, California. We collected partner-specific relational and contraceptive data on all sexual partnerships for each individual, on four occasions, over one year. Using three-level multinomial logistic regression models, we examined individual and relationship factors predictive of contraceptive use. Results indicated that both individual and relationship factors predicted contraceptive use, but factors varied by method. Participants reporting greater perceived partner exclusivity and relationship commitment were more likely to use hormonal/long-acting methods only or a less effective method/no method versus condoms only. Those with greater participation in sexual decision making were more likely to use any method over a less effective method/no method and were more likely to use condoms only or dual methods versus a hormonal/long-acting method only. In addition, for women only, those who reported greater relationship commitment were more likely to use hormonal/long-acting methods or a less effective method/no method versus a dual method. In summary, interactive relationship qualities and dynamics (commitment and sexual decision making) significantly predicted contraceptive use.

Citing Articles

Investigating College Women's Contraceptive Choices and Sexuality.

Chinopfukutwa V, Blodgett Salafia E Int J Sex Health. 2024; 33(3):268-282.

PMID: 38595741 PMC: 10929579. DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1908477.


Psychometric analysis and linguistic adaptation of the Persian version of Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES-P).

Azari N, Mahmoodi H, Mousavi S, Mirghafourvand M, Keikhaee R, Shaghaghi A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):906.

PMID: 38539135 PMC: 10967056. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18147-z.


Contraceptive Attitudes and Use among Tertiary Students in Greece.

Iliadou M, Stavraki E, Hina T, Orovou E, Tzitiridou-Chatzopoulou M, Eskitzis P Maedica (Bucur). 2024; 18(4):639-644.

PMID: 38348068 PMC: 10859194. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.639.


Are LARC Users Less Likely to Use Condoms? An Analysis of U.S. Women Initiating LARC in 2008-2018.

Eeckhaut M, Fitzpatrick K Womens Health Issues. 2022; 32(5):431-439.

PMID: 35750593 PMC: 10557127. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.05.002.


A Mixed-Methods Pilot Evaluation of Manhood 2.0, a Program to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy Among Young Men.

Manlove J, Parekh J, Whitfield B, Griffith I, Garg A, Fasula A Am J Mens Health. 2022; 16(3):15579883221104895.

PMID: 35723069 PMC: 9344189. DOI: 10.1177/15579883221104895.


References
1.
Harvey S, Kraft J, West S, Taylor A, Pappas-DeLuca K, Beckman L . Effects of a health behavior change model--based HIV/STI prevention intervention on condom use among heterosexual couples: a randomized trial. Health Educ Behav. 2008; 36(5):878-94. DOI: 10.1177/1090198108322821. View

2.
Brafford L, Beck K . Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. J Am Coll Health. 1991; 39(5):219-25. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238. View

3.
Cheng D, Schwarz E, Douglas E, Horon I . Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception. 2009; 79(3):194-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.09.009. View

4.
Gemmill A, Lindberg L . Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(1):64-71. PMC: 3749871. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182955e58. View

5.
Keller A . Contraceptive acceptability research: utility and limitations. Stud Fam Plann. 1979; 10(8-9):230-7. View