Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the Evaluation of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The aims of this retrospective analysis were to compare Ga-PSMA PET findings and low-dose CT findings (120 kV, 30 mA), and to obtain semiquantitative and quantitative Ga-PSMA PET data in patients with prostate cancer (PC) bone metastases.
Methods: In total, 152 PET/CT scans from 140 patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 30 had previously untreated primary PC, and 110 had biochemical relapse after treatment of primary PC. All patients underwent dynamic PET/CT scanning of the pelvis and lower abdomen as well as whole-body PET/CT with Ga-PSMA-11. The PET/CT scans were analysed qualitatively (visually), semiquantitatively (SUV), and quantitatively based on a two-tissue compartment model and a noncompartmental approach leading to the extraction of the fractal dimension. Differences were considered significant for p values <0.05.
Results: In total, 168 Ga-PSMA-positive and 113 CT-positive skeletal lesions were detected in 37 patients (8 with primary PC, 29 with biochemical recurrence). Of these 168 lesions, 103 were both Ga-PSMA PET-positive and CT-positive, 65 were only Ga-PSMA-positive, and 10 were only CT-positive. The Yang test showed that there were significantly more Ga-PSMA PET-positive lesions than CT-positive lesions. Association analysis showed that PSA plasma levels were significantly correlated with several Ga-PSMA-11-associated parameters in bone metastases, including the degree of tracer uptake (SUV and SUV), its transport rate from plasma to the interstitial/intracellular compartment (K), its rate of binding to the PSMA receptor and its internalization (k), its influx rate (K), and its distribution heterogeneity.
Conclusion: Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a useful diagnostic tool in the detection of bone metastases in PC. Ga-PSMA PET visualizes more bone metastases than low-dose CT. PSA plasma levels are significantly correlated with several Ga-PSMA PET parameters.
Adiyat K, Pooleri G, Cherian D, Gopalan Nair Santhamma S, Ravichandran K, Sundaram S Int Urol Nephrol. 2023; 55(6):1453-1457.
PMID: 37086333 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03595-0.
Imaging Techniques in Pharmacological Precision Medicine.
Freidel L, Li S, Choffart A, Kuebler L, Martins A Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2023; 280:213-235.
PMID: 36907970 DOI: 10.1007/164_2023_641.
Koerber S, Kroener R, Dendl K, Kratochwil C, Fink C, Ristau J Mol Imaging Biol. 2022; 25(2):375-383.
PMID: 35999425 PMC: 10006015. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01766-6.
Kesler M, Kerzhner K, Druckmann I, Kuten J, Levine C, Sarid D Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 49(6):2077-2085.
PMID: 34957528 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05655-y.
Wang Z, Zheng A, Li Y, Dong W, Liu X, Yuan W Front Oncol. 2021; 11:759053.
PMID: 34778079 PMC: 8581554. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759053.