» Articles » PMID: 29356875

Upper Metastable Limit Osmolality of Urine As a Predictor of Kidney Stone Formation in Children

Overview
Journal Urolithiasis
Publisher Springer
Specialty Urology
Date 2018 Jan 23
PMID 29356875
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High fluid intake has been universally recommended for kidney stone prophylaxis. We evaluated 24-h urine osmolality regarded as the best biomarker of optimal hydration and upper metastable limit osmolality after water evaporation from urine sample to the onset of spontaneous crystallization and its usefulness as a new risk index that would describe an individual lithogenic potential. We collected 24-h urine from 257 pediatric patients with kidney stones and 270 controls. After volume and osmolality assessment, the urine samples were subjected to volume reduction in vacuum rotavapor continued to the onset of an induced urinary crystallization. The upper metastable limit osmolality of urine sample was calculated based on its initial osmolality value and the amount of water reduction. Pediatric stone formers presented with higher urine volume and lower urine osmolality than healthy controls. Despite that, their urine samples required much lower volume reduction to induce the spontaneous crystallization than those of controls. The ROC analysis revealed an AUC for the upper metastable limit osmolality of 0.9300 (95% CI 0.9104-0.9496) for distinguishing between stone formers and healthy subjects. At the cutoff of 2696 mOsm/kg, the test provided sensitivity and specificity of 0.8638 and 0.8189, respectively. 24-h urine osmolality provided the information about current hydration status, whereas evaporation test estimated the urinary potential to crystalize dependent on urine composition. Upper metastable limit osmolality may estimate the individual lithogenic capability and identify people at risk to stone formation when exposed to dehydration.

Citing Articles

Infant primary hyperoxaluria type 1 A case report and literature review.

Zheng Y, Li Q, Liang S Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 49(6):856-862.

PMID: 39311781 PMC: 11420975. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230582.


Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Primary Hyperoxaluria: Traditional Management Defied by the Rise of Novel Molecular Drugs.

Huang Y, Zhu W, Zhou J, Huang Q, Zeng G Biomolecules. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38785918 PMC: 11117870. DOI: 10.3390/biom14050511.


Diagnostic value of urinary Tamm-Horsfall protein and 24 h urine osmolality for recurrent calcium oxalate stones of the upper urinary tract: Cross-sectional study.

Fang D, Hu Y, Wang C, Tang C Open Med (Wars). 2023; 18(1):20230848.

PMID: 38025535 PMC: 10656756. DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0848.


Clinical practice recommendations for primary hyperoxaluria: an expert consensus statement from ERKNet and OxalEurope.

Groothoff J, Metry E, Deesker L, Garrelfs S, Acquaviva C, Almardini R Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023; 19(3):194-211.

PMID: 36604599 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00661-1.


The role of urinary supersaturations for lithogenic salts in the progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Ferraro P, Bargagli M, Faller N, Anderegg M, Huynh-Do U, Vogt B J Nephrol. 2022; 36(4):1011-1018.

PMID: 36528688 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01540-5.


References
1.
Remer T, Neubert A, Maser-Gluth C . Anthropometry-based reference values for 24-h urinary creatinine excretion during growth and their use in endocrine and nutritional research. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 75(3):561-9. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/75.3.561. View

2.
Ebner A, Manz F . Sex difference of urinary osmolality in German children. Am J Nephrol. 2002; 22(4):352-5. DOI: 10.1159/000065226. View

3.
Manz F, Wentz A, Sichert-Hellert W . The most essential nutrient: defining the adequate intake of water. J Pediatr. 2002; 141(4):587-92. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2002.128031. View

4.
Hess B . Nutritional aspects of stone disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2002; 31(4):1017-30, ix-x. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8529(02)00029-4. View

5.
Shirreffs S . Markers of hydration status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003; 57 Suppl 2:S6-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601895. View