» Articles » PMID: 29320491

Cdc73 Suppresses Genome Instability by Mediating Telomere Homeostasis

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2018 Jan 11
PMID 29320491
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Defects in the genes encoding the Paf1 complex can cause increased genome instability. Loss of Paf1, Cdc73, and Ctr9, but not Rtf1 or Leo1, caused increased accumulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). Combining the cdc73Δ mutation with individual deletions of 43 other genes, including TEL1 and YKU80, which are involved in telomere maintenance, resulted in synergistic increases in GCR rates. Whole genome sequence analysis of GCRs indicated that there were reduced relative rates of GCRs mediated by de novo telomere additions and increased rates of translocations and inverted duplications in cdc73Δ single and double mutants. Analysis of telomere lengths and telomeric gene silencing in strains containing different combinations of cdc73Δ, tel1Δ and yku80Δ mutations suggested that combinations of these mutations caused increased defects in telomere maintenance. A deletion analysis of Cdc73 revealed that a central 105 amino acid region was necessary and sufficient for suppressing the defects observed in cdc73Δ strains; this region was required for the binding of Cdc73 to the Paf1 complex through Ctr9 and for nuclear localization of Cdc73. Taken together, these data suggest that the increased GCR rate of cdc73Δ single and double mutants is due to partial telomere dysfunction and that Ctr9 and Paf1 play a central role in the Paf1 complex potentially by scaffolding the Paf1 complex subunits or by mediating recruitment of the Paf1 complex to the different processes it functions in.

Citing Articles

Identification of different classes of genome instability suppressor genes through analysis of DNA damage response markers.

Li B, Kolodner R, Putnam C G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38526099 PMC: 11152081. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae064.


Cdc73 protects Notch-induced T-cell leukemia cells from DNA damage and mitochondrial stress.

Melnick A, Mullin C, Lin K, McCarter A, Liang S, Liu Y Blood. 2023; 142(25):2159-2174.

PMID: 37616559 PMC: 10733839. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020144.


Genomic and transcriptomic profiling reveal molecular characteristics of parathyroid carcinoma.

Jo S, Hong N, Lee S, Jeong J, Won J, Park J Exp Mol Med. 2023; 55(5):886-897.

PMID: 37121965 PMC: 10238422. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-023-00968-4.


The clinicopathological and prognostic significances of CDC73 expression in breast cancer: A pathological and bioinformatics analysis.

E Y, Xue H, Zhang C, Zhao M, Zheng H Histol Histopathol. 2022; 38(4):453-465.

PMID: 36255176 DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-534.


New data and collaborations at the Saccharomyces Genome Database: updated reference genome, alleles, and the Alliance of Genome Resources.

Engel S, Wong E, Nash R, Aleksander S, Alexander M, Douglass E Genetics. 2021; 220(4).

PMID: 34897464 PMC: 9209811. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab224.


References
1.
Kolodner R, Cleveland D, Putnam C . Cancer. Aneuploidy drives a mutator phenotype in cancer. Science. 2011; 333(6045):942-3. PMC: 3806716. DOI: 10.1126/science.1211154. View

2.
Chan J, Kolodner R . A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7(5):e1002089. PMC: 3102749. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002089. View

3.
Frank-Raue K, Haag C, Schulze E, Keuser R, Raue F, Dralle H . CDC73-related hereditary hyperparathyroidism: five new mutations and the clinical spectrum. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011; 165(3):477-83. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-11-0003. View

4.
Tous C, Rondon A, Garcia-Rubio M, Gonzalez-Aguilera C, Luna R, Aguilera A . A novel assay identifies transcript elongation roles for the Nup84 complex and RNA processing factors. EMBO J. 2011; 30(10):1953-64. PMC: 3098481. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.109. View

5.
Pfingsten J, Goodrich K, Taabazuing C, Ouenzar F, Chartrand P, Cech T . Mutually exclusive binding of telomerase RNA and DNA by Ku alters telomerase recruitment model. Cell. 2012; 148(5):922-32. PMC: 3327133. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.033. View